Review
Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Data and theory from prism adaptation are reviewed for the purpose of identifying control methods in applications of the procedure. Prism exposure evokes three kinds of adaptive or compensatory processes: postural adjustments (visual capture and muscle potentiation), strategic control (including recalibration of target position), and spatial realignment of various sensory-motor reference frames. Muscle potentiation, recalibration, and realignment can all produce prism exposure aftereffects and can all contribute to adaptive performance during prism exposure. Control over these adaptive responses can be achieved by manipulating the locus of asymmetric exercise during exposure (muscle potentiation), the similarity between exposure and post-exposure tasks (calibration), and the timing of visual feedback availability during exposure (realignment).

Section snippets

Empirical observations

When a person first looks through wedge prisms that optically displace the visual field, for example 10° in the rightward direction, the person may have little feeling that anything is out of the ordinary, but then he/she experiences surprising difficulty in perceptual-motor tasks (i.e. direct effects of prism exposure). For example, pointing toward a visual target produces error to the right of target position, where the target is seen to be located. Performance error is gradually reduced to

Adaptive processes

Prism exposure evokes all the mechanisms of adaptive perceptual-motor performance in all their complexity (Redding and Wallace, 1997a). At least three classes of adaptive processes are elicited by prism exposure: postural adjustments, strategic control, and spatial realignment (or ‘true’ adaptation). All of these classes of processes can affect performance during prism exposure where performance feedback is available (direct effects) and performance after prism exposure where performance

Strategic control and spatial alignment

High-level strategic control and low-level spatial alignment are separable, but interdependent. We begin by providing a behavioral definition of the two concepts, we then outline the perceptual-motor organization that supports the two adaptive functions, and finally we consider the manner in which they interact and generalize for the particular exposure task.

Critique of selected applications

In this section, we illustrate with selected, representative applications of prism adaptation the need for more adequate control procedures. We first consider applications where the primary interest was in illuminating the nature of ordinary perceptual-motor control. Then, we examine applications where the interest was in neuropathology, especially unilateral neglect.

Kitazawa et al. (1997) employed the prism adaptation procedure to study the relationship between the kinematics and dynamics of

Conclusions and recommendations

Prism adaptation is not a simple process. Exposure to prismatic displacement evokes all of the processes of adaptive perceptual-motor performance, including postural adjustments (esp. muscle-potentiation), strategic control (esp. recalibration), and differential spatial realignment of various sensory-motor reference frames. Prism adaptation can be used for many different applications, but minimal methodological standards should be met before the procedure is developed for a specific

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants to the second author from INSERM (PROGRES) and ACI Cognitique (plasticité). Special thanks are expressed to Laure Pisella, Alessandro Farnè and Gilles Rode for helpful comments on the manuscript.

References (132)

  • C.A. Roller et al.

    Variable practice with lenses improves visuo-motor plasticity

    Cognitive Brain Research

    (2001)
  • R.A. Andersen et al.

    Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements

    Annual Review of Neuroscience

    (1997)
  • J.S. Baizer et al.

    Cerebellar lesions and prism adaptation in macaque monkeys

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1999)
  • P. Baraduc et al.

    Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2002)
  • C. Bard et al.

    Contribution of proprioception for calibrating and updating the motor space

    Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

    (1995)
  • F.L. Bedford

    Constraints on learning new mappings between perceptual dimensions

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1989)
  • F. Bedford

    Perceptual and cognitive spatial learning

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1993)
  • F.L. Bedford

    A pair of paradoxes and the perceptual pairing process

    Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition

    (1994)
  • F.L. Bedford

    Towards a general law of numerical/object identity

    Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition

    (2001)
  • N. Berberovic et al.

    Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgments of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space

    Neuropsychologia

    (2002)
  • N. Berberovic et al.

    Prismatic adaptation reduces biased temporal order judgements in spatial neglect

    NeuroReport

    (2004)
  • G.P. Bingham et al.

    The rate of adaptation to displacement prisms remains constant despite acquisition of rapid calibration

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1999)
  • E. Bisiach et al.
  • H.P. Bowditch et al.

    A comparison of sight and touch

    Journal of Physiology

    (1880)
  • D.M. Clower et al.

    Selective use of perceptual recalibration versus visuomotor skill acquisition

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2000)
  • D.M. Clower et al.

    Role of posterior parietal cortex in the recalibration of visually guided reaching

    Nature

    (1996)
  • C.L. Colby et al.

    Space and attention in parietal cortex

    Annual Review of Neuroscience

    (1999)
  • B. Craske et al.

    Oculomotor adaptation to prisms is not simply a muscle potentiation effect

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1975)
  • B. Craske et al.

    Spatial discordance is a sufficient condition for oculomotor adaptation to prisms: eye muscle potentiation need not be a factor

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1978)
  • J.B. de Graaf et al.

    Modifications in end positions of arm movements following short term saccadic adaptation

    NeuroReport

    (1995)
  • R. Dewar

    Adaptation to displaced vision: variations on the ‘prismatic shaping’ technique

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1971)
  • S.M. Ebenholtz

    The possible role of eye-muscle potentiation in several forms of prism adaptation

    Perception

    (1974)
  • S.M. Ebenholtz

    Additivity of aftereffects of maintained head and eye rotations: an alternative to recalibration

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1976)
  • S.M. Ebenholtz et al.

    Distance adaptation depends upon plasticity in the oculomotor control system

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1982)
  • S. Ferber et al.

    Eye movements tell only half the story: analysing scan paths to chimeric faces in a patient with neglect pre and post prism adaptation

    Neurology

    (2003)
  • J. Fernández-Ruiz et al.

    Learning motor synergies makes use of information on muscular load

    Learning and Memory

    (2000)
  • F. Frassinetti et al.

    Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation

    Brain

    (2002)
  • E. Guigon et al.

    A neural model of perceptual-motor alignment

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (2002)
  • C.S. Harris

    Beware the straight-ahead shift: a nonperceptual change in experiments on adaptation to displaced vision

    Perception

    (1974)
  • J.C. Hay et al.

    Visual and proprioceptive adaptation to optical displacement of the visual stimulus

    Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1966)
  • J.C. Hay et al.

    Visual capture produced by prism spectacles

    Psychonomic Science

    (1965)
  • L. Hay

    Contribution à l'étude de l'organisation de l'espace postural chez l'Homme: Étude expérimentale de l'adaptation des différents segments du corps à une déviation prismatique du champ visuel (Contribution to the study of the organization of postural space in man: experimental study of the adaptation of different body segments to a prismatic displacement of the visual field.)

    Cahiers de Psychologie

    (1970)
  • L. Hay et al.

    Analyse de la réorganisation des coordinations visuo-motrices chez l'homme (Analysis of the reorganization of visual-motor coordination in man.)

    L'Année Psychologique (Paris)

    (1972)
  • K.M. Heilman et al.

    Neglect and related disorders

  • R. Held et al.

    Adaptation to disarranged hand-eye coordination contingent upon reafferent stimulation

    Perceptual and Motor Skills

    (1958)
  • Helmholtz, H.E.F. von, 1909/1962. in: Southhall, J.P.C., Trans. (Eds.), Treatise on Physiological Optics, Dover New...
  • I.P. Howard et al.

    The relative lability of mobile and stationary components in a visual-motor adaptation task

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1974)
  • H.A. Ingram et al.

    The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task

    Experimental Brain Research

    (2000)
  • L.S. Jakobson et al.

    Trajectories of reaches to prismatically-displaced targets: evidence for ‘automatic’ visuomotor recalibration

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1989)
  • M. Jeannerod et al.

    Visuomotor coordination as a dissociable visual function: experimental and clinical evidence

    Bailliére's Clinical Neurology

    (1993)
  • Cited by (339)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text