The impact of synaptic conductance on action potential waveform: Evoking realistic action potentials with a simulated synaptic conductance
Introduction
The intrinsic properties of a neuron are crucial in determining how it integrates, computes and transmits information to other cells. Although influenced by morphology and passive cable structure (Mainen and Sejnowski, 1996), the suite of ion channels expressed and their location on the cell membrane are a major determinant of a neuron's processing abilities (Dodson et al., 2003, Ogawa and Rasband, 2008). There are two common methods of stimulation used to approximate physiological inputs under current clamp: injection of step depolarizing current through the recording electrode or electrical stimulation of presynaptic axons (orthodromic synaptic stimulation).
For cells that require excitatory synaptic input to generate action potentials (APs), orthodromic synaptic activation is an ideal physiological stimulus. However, some disadvantages arise when studying the physiology of the postsynaptic cell: first, pharmacological tools may act at pre- and postsynaptic sites (e.g. tetraethylammonium TEA, blocks Kv3 channels and broadens the AP at both sites, causing increased transmitter release, Ishikawa et al., 2003). Second, there are many presynaptic changes which may confound interpretation (e.g. quantal fluctuation, short-term depression, facilitation, presynaptic modulation) particularly during repetitive stimulation.
Direct somatic current injection avoids these problems, but the resultant APs are not accompanied by the synaptic conductance and associated changes in resistance. A more physiological stimulus should take account of the ionic driving forces caused by the voltage changes during the AP.
This study compares different methods of AP generation and provides some simple insights into designing a current injection paradigm that more closely mimics a supra-threshold orthodromic excitatory input. We have used the calyx of Held preparation, since this is a secure synapse with a large safety factor. Our approach has been to make this method broadly applicable, avoiding use of dynamic clamp methods by using a simple computation of the AP and synaptic current. We show that the synaptic conductance has a profound influence on the AP waveform, and assert that this should be considered when studying physiological roles of channels. This method can be simply applied to evoke more physiological AP waveforms without the expense or detailed knowledge of the existing conductances required to implement dynamic clamp methods.
Section snippets
In vitro preparation
Brain slices were prepared as described previously (Postlethwaite et al., 2007, Johnston et al., 2008a). Briefly, CBA/Ca mice or Lister Hooded rats aged P10–P19 were decapitated in accordance with the UK animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the brain was removed in a slush of iced artificial CSF (aCSF) of composition (in mM) 250 sucrose, 2.5 KCl, 10 glucose, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 0.5 ascorbic acid, 26 NaHCO3, 4 MgCl2, 0.1 CaCl2, gassed with 95% O2/5% CO2 (pH 7.4). The brain was placed ventral
Results
Comparison of postsynaptic action potentials generated by three standard types of depolarizing stimulus clearly illustrates that they are not equivalent (Fig. 2) with each producing a different waveform AP in the same neuron. A long current step is often employed in excitable cells to study intrinsic properties and evoke APs, while a brief pulse has the advantage of generating a short latency response and is commonly used to trigger trains of APs. We compared APs evoked by long duration current
Discussion
This paper addresses the simple yet fundamental observation that evoked AP waveforms differ depending on the nature of the triggering stimulus. Step current injections evoked APs with waveforms which were distinct from those elicited by orthodromic synaptic stimulation. By definition, the orthodromic synaptic input is the most physiological method of AP generation, but current injection is often assumed to be equivalent; we show here that it is not. There are several situations where synaptic
Acknowledgements
Funded by the MRC.
References (21)
- et al.
The functional organization and assembly of the axon initial segment
Curr Opin Neurobiol
(2008) - et al.
The dynamic clamp comes of age
Trends Neurosci
(2004) - et al.
Pre- and postsynaptic glutamate receptors at a giant excitatory synapse in rat auditory brainstem slices
J Physiol
(1995) - et al.
Detecting synaptic connections in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body using calcium imaging
Pflugers Arch
(2002) - et al.
Two voltage-dependent K+ conductances with complementary functions in postsynaptic integration at a central auditory synapse
J Neurosci
(1995) - et al.
Two heteromeric Kv1 potassium channels differentially regulate action potential firing
J Neurosci
(2002) - et al.
Presynaptic rat Kv1.2 channels suppress synaptic terminal hyperexcitability following action potential invasion
J Physiol (Lond)
(2003) - et al.
Distinct roles of Kv1 and Kv3 potassium channels at the calyx of Held presynaptic terminal
J Neurosci
(2003) - et al.
Kv4 (A-type) potassium currents in the mouse medial nucleus of the trapezoid body
Eur J Neurosci
(2008) - et al.
Initial segment Kv2.2 channels mediate a slow delayed rectifier and maintain high frequency action potential firing in medial nucleus of the trapezoid body neurons
J Physiol
(2008)
Cited by (0)
- 1
Present address: Department of Biology, University of Victoria, BC, Canada.
- 2
Present address: GU Biology, Pfizer Global R & D, Ramsgate Road, Sandwich, Kent CT13 9NJ, UK.
- 3
Both these authors contributed equally to this work.