Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 260, Issues 1–2, February 2010, Pages 20-29
Hearing Research

Research paper
Effects of isoflurane on auditory evoked potentials in the cochlea and brainstem of guinea pigs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2009.10.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Electrophysiological recordings of the auditory system are commonly performed in deeply anesthetized animals. This study evaluated the effects of various concentrations of the volatile anesthetic isoflurane (1–3%) on the compound action potential (CAP), cochlear microphonic (CM) and auditory brainstem response (ABR). Recordings were initiated in the awake, lightly restrained animal. Anesthesia was induced with a single dose of Hypnorm® (fentanyl and fluanisone). After tracheostomy increasing isoflurane concentrations were applied in N2O/O2 via controlled ventilation. Data were compared to recordings in the awake animal using repeated measures ANOVA and Dunnett’s post hoc test. On average, isoflurane dose-dependently suppressed the amplitude and increased the latency of the CAP. CM amplitude was suppressed. These effects were most profound at high frequencies and were typically significant at isoflurane concentrations of 2.5% and 3%. Amplitude and latency of the second negative peak of the CAP (N2) were affected to a greater extent compared to the first peak (N1). On average, isoflurane dose-dependently reduced the amplitude and increased the latency of the ABR. These effects were typically significant at an isoflurane concentration of 2%. Effects on peak IV and V were more pronounced compared to the early peaks I and III.

Introduction

Experimental electrophysiological recordings of the auditory system are frequently performed under deep anesthesia. General anesthesia is essential when invasive surgery is needed and can be necessary to prevent movement of the animal to minimize artifacts during recordings. Volatile anesthetics such as isoflurane, can be preferable above injection anesthetics since the anesthetic regime can be regulated precisely and adapted swiftly in answer to an altered physiological status of the animal. This can be especially advantageous in sensitive animals such as guinea pigs, which are notoriously difficult for achieving a safe and effective general anesthesia (Wolfensohn and Lloyd, 1994). Anesthetics, including the volatile anesthetics, affect the physiological status of the animal which has to be taken into account when interpreting electrophysiological data in the anesthetized animal.

The acoustically evoked brainstem response (ABR), compound action potential (CAP) and cochlear microphonic (CM) are routinely recorded in anesthetized animals to assess the functionality of the auditory pathway. With regard to the ABR, general anesthetics such as barbiturates (Shapiro et al., 1984, Drummond et al., 1985, Church and Shucard, 1987), ketamine (Church and Gritzke, 1987) and the halogenated volatiles (Dubois et al., 1982, Sainz et al., 1987, Santarelli et al., 2003) typically increase its latency, especially of later peaks, without affecting the amplitude. Nitrous oxide (Manninen et al., 1985), and the opioids morphine and fentanyl (Samra et al., 1984, Samra et al., 1985) do not affect the ABR. Effects of general anesthetics on the peripheral auditory system are less well characterized and reported effects are variable. Pentobarbital and ketamine have been reported to increase threshold and latency of the CAP at high stimulus frequencies (Cazals et al., 1980). Pentobarbital has also been shown to reduce CM amplitude (Samara and Tonndorf, 1981). In contrast, a later study examining the effect of various anesthetics including pentobarbital and ketamine showed no effects on either CAP amplitude or latency (Brown et al., 1983). The NMDA antagonist 2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate (a ketamine-like compound) has been shown to suppress the amplitude and increase the latency of CAPs, without affecting CM amplitude (Puel et al., 1991). Finally, benzodiazepines were shown to increase CAP amplitude, but decrease the CM (Velluti and Pedemonte, 1986).

This study evaluated the effects of isoflurane on auditory evoked potentials. Isoflurane is a general inhalation anesthetic that induces sedation, hypnosis, immobility and amnesia. Isoflurane has a broad pharmacological profile and affects many neurotransmitter receptor systems including the GABAergic, glycinergic, acetylcholinergic, serotoninergic and glutamatergic system (reviewed by Eger (2004) and Grasshoff et al. (2005)).

Much attention has focussed on the effects of isoflurane on the auditory cortical system and especially the auditory middle latency response (MLR) has received attention. Numerous studies have shown that isoflurane decreases MLR amplitude and increases MLR latency (e.g. Thornton et al., 1992, Schwender et al., 1997, Leistritz et al., 2002). Effects of isoflurane on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) have also been well documented. Several studies on the effects of isoflurane in humans have shown an increased latency of the late ABR peaks. ABR amplitude was unaffected in these studies (Manninen et al., 1985, Sebel et al., 1986, Lloyd-Thomas et al., 1990). In rats isoflurane has been shown to increase the latency of all ABR peaks including peak I (Santarelli et al., 2003). Since the early peak I of the ABR is thought to represent auditory nerve activity (Legatt, 2002), this indirectly indicates that the auditory nerve response is delayed in rats, but not in humans. Effects of isoflurane on the auditory nerve and cochlear responses using direct CAP recordings have not yet been reported. Isoflurane was shown to suppress the amplitude of evoked otoacoustic emissions, indicating an effect on cochlear hair cells (Ferber-Viart et al., 1998).

In this study we examined the effects of various concentrations of the volatile anesthetic isoflurane using electrocochleography and ABR recordings in guinea pigs. We report effects of isoflurane on the amplitude, threshold and latency of the CAP and ABR, and on the amplitude and threshold of the CM.

Section snippets

Animals and surgery

Seven healthy female albino guinea pigs (strain: Dunkin Hartley; supplier: Harlan Laboratories) were used that weighed 300–600 g at the time of recording. Surgical procedures on these animals were approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of the Academic Biomedical Centre of the University of Utrecht under numbers 05.02.021 and 2007.I.02.025. Animals were housed according to the standards of the animal care facility of the University of Utrecht.

Animals were equipped with chronically implanted

Effects of isoflurane on CAP and CM in individual animals

CAP and CM data were obtained in five animals. Fig. 1 shows CAP recordings at 11.3 kHz in a representative animal in the awake condition and when artificially ventilated with 3% isoflurane. Isoflurane clearly decreased CAP amplitudes. Fig. 2 displays the effects of isoflurane on CAP and CM in individual animals to illustrate inter-animal variability. Cochlear responses were evoked with 11.3 kHz tones of 63 dB SPL and are shown as a function of isoflurane concentration. In four out of five animals

Discussion

We have shown that isoflurane affects the auditory system from periphery (CAP, CM) to brainstem (ABR) in the guinea pig. On average, isoflurane dose-dependently suppressed the amplitude and increased the threshold of the CAP. Effects on CM amplitude were more variable, but at high concentrations CM was invariably suppressed. Isoflurane dose-dependently increased CAP latency. Effects were most pronounced at high frequencies (Fig. 3, Fig. 4) and were typically significant at 2.5–3% isoflurane.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Heinsius-Houbolt fund, Wassenaar, The Netherlands.

The authors wish to thank Rik Mansvelt-Beck and Josine Verhaal for technical assistance and are grateful to René van de Vosse for data acquisition and analysis software and technical assistance.

References (57)

  • R.R. Marsh et al.

    Auditory brain-stem response and temperature: relationship in the guinea pig

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1984)
  • A. Mitchell et al.

    Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig

    Hear. Res.

    (1997)
  • A.R. Moller

    On the origin of the compound action potentials (N1, N2) of the cochlea of the rat

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1983)
  • O. Ozturk et al.

    Effects of sevoflurane and TIVA with propofol on middle ear pressure

    Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.

    (2006)
  • O. Ozturk et al.

    Effects of desflurane on middle ear pressure

    Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.

    (2007)
  • J.L. Puel

    Chemical synaptic transmission in the cochlea

    Prog. Neurobiol.

    (1995)
  • J.L. Puel et al.

    Electrophysiological evidence for the presence of NMDA receptors in the guinea pig cochlea

    Hear. Res.

    (1991)
  • T.L. Sahley et al.

    Effects of opioid be drugs on auditory evoked potentials suggest a role of lateral olivocochlear dynorphins in auditory function

    Hear. Res.

    (1991)
  • M. Samara et al.

    Effect of anesthesia on maximal cochlear microphonics

    Hear. Res.

    (1981)
  • P.S. Sebel et al.

    Evoked potentials during isoflurane anaesthesia

    Br. J. Anaesth.

    (1986)
  • S.M. Shapiro et al.

    Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in rats with high-dose pentobarbital

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1984)
  • R.M. Sharpe et al.

    Auditory evoked response, median frequency and 95% spectral edge during anaesthesia with desflurane and nitrous oxide

    Br. J. Anaesth.

    (1997)
  • C.H.M. Stengs et al.

    Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity: electrophysiological evidence of spontaneous recovery in the albino guinea pig

    Hear. Res.

    (1997)
  • C. Thornton et al.

    The auditory evoked response as an indicator of awareness

    Br. J. Anaesth.

    (1989)
  • C. Thornton et al.

    Somatosensory and auditory evoked responses recorded simultaneously: differential effects of nitrous oxide and isoflurane

    Br. J. Anaesth.

    (1992)
  • R. Velluti et al.

    Differential effects of benzodiazepines on cochlear and auditory nerve responses

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1986)
  • H. Versnel et al.

    Time course of cochlear electrophysiology and morphology after combined administration of kanamycin and furosemide

    Hear. Res.

    (2007)
  • R. Charlet de Sauvage et al.

    Changes in CM and CAP with sedation and temperature in the guinea pig: facts and interpretation

    Hear. Res.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (31)

    • General anesthetic induced differential changes in latency of auditory evoked potential in the central nucleus of inferior colliculus of mouse

      2019, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      General anesthetic may act on inhibitory neurons outside the brainstem, strengthen IPSP and alter BAEP. Although the acoustic pathway comprises several different physical media (air, liquid (e.g., perilymph and endolymph in inner ear), nerve fibers, pre-synaptic membrane (including cytomembrane of hair cell in inner ear [14]), post-synaptic membrane, and synaptic cleft), only two functional processes are involved: (1) the travel of signals through one medium, and (2) the transfer of signals between two different media. BAEP is summary of the auditory pathways’ acoustic evoked electrical activities [5].

    • Isoflurane anesthesia suppresses distortion product otoacoustic emissions in rats

      2018, Journal of Otology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The results of this analysis demonstrate dramatically lower DP amplitudes obtained with isoflurane compared to k/x. Furthermore, post-hoc analyses indicated that the degree of DP amplitude reductions occur relatively equal across the measured frequency range. Many reports have indicated that isoflurane can impair auditory function (Bielefeld, 2014; Cederholm et al., 2012; Ruebhausen et al., 2012; Stronks et al., 2010). Studies in guinea-pigs point to impaired OHC amplification as a likely mechanism for isoflurane-induced impairment (Stronks et al., 2010), while results in the mustache bat show OHC amplification can actually improve under isoflurane (Drexl et al., 2004).

    • Increased anesthesia time using 2,2,2-tribromoethanol-chloral hydrate with low impact on mouse psychoacoustics

      2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Amplitudes and latencies of ABRs measured from awake mice are similar to the values we observed under 2,2,2-tribromoethanol anesthesia alone (van Looij et al., 2004). Other anesthetics, such as isoflurane and ketamine/xylazine, have been shown to suppress ABR amplitudes by 20% and increase wave latencies by 1 ms in rodents when compared to awake recordings (McGee et al., 1983; Santarelli et al., 2003; Stronks et al., 2010; van Looij et al., 2004). Using the combination 2,2,2-tribromoethanol–chloral hydrate anesthesia, we observe negligible increases in wave latencies and non-systematic changes in amplitude, which is a preferable and more consistent method for collecting and analyzing psychoacoustics.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text