Re-valuing the amygdala

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.007Get rights and content

Recent advances indicate that the amygdala represents valence: a general appetitive/aversive affective characteristic that bears similarity to the neuroeconomic concept of value. Neurophysiological studies show that individual amygdala neurons respond differentially to a range of stimuli with positive or negative affective significance. Meanwhile, increasingly specific lesion/inactivation studies reveal that the amygdala is necessary for processes  for example, fear extinction and reinforcer devaluation  that involve updating representations of value. Furthermore, recent neuroimaging studies suggest that the human amygdala mediates performance on many reward-based decision-making tasks. The encoding of affective significance by the amygdala might be best described as a representation of state value  a representation that is useful for coordinating physiological, behavioral, and cognitive responses in an affective/emotional context.

Introduction

For many years, the amygdala was thought of primarily as a center for fear in the brain. This perception was fueled by a wealth of experimental data, mainly from rodents, that emerged from the fear conditioning paradigm (summarized in [1, 2]). Classic lesion and inactivation studies established that the amygdala is essential for the perception of fear, the expression of fearful behavior, and the acquisition of fear in response to stimuli that had been paired with aversive outcomes (Pavlovian fear conditioning) (e.g. [3], reviewed in [4]). Neurophysiological studies, which also were mainly limited to rodents, showed that cells in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) had firing rates that were highly sensitive to stimuli that were associated with fear-inducing events, and also to the aversive events themselves [4, 5].

While new light continues to be shed on the detailed functioning of the amygdala with regard to fear learning and fearful behavior, in recent years, a surge of work in humans and non-human primates has led to an expanded conception of the amygdala's role. The anatomical connections of the amygdala in primates hint at a reason for this: especially compared to rodents, humans and non-human primates have a hugely elaborated prefrontal cortex (PFC) [6], many parts of which  especially medial and orbital areas  have extensive bidirectional connections with the amygdala [7, 8, 9, 10]. The amygdala receives input from a full range of higher sensory and poly-sensory areas, and projects back to them in turn, even to primary sensory targets (connections that may be unique to primates) [11, 12, 13]. Other targets of amygdala output include the hippocampus, basal ganglia, perirhinal and entorhinal cortices, the basal forebrain, and subcortical structures such as the hypothalamus [14]. In sum, the anatomical situation of the amygdala seems to imply the potential for a far more wide-ranging role than ‘danger alarm.’

Using a combination of new techniques and innovative extensions of old ones, neuroscientists have uncovered a role for the amygdala in a wide variety of tasks with an emotional component, whether appetitive or aversive [15]. Emotional responses frequently occur in reaction to stimuli that predict impending rewarding or aversive reinforcement, and they are often described within a framework that uses two axes to characterize emotions: arousal (from calm to excited) and valence (from extremely negative to extremely positive) [16]. As we discuss below, recent data implicate the amygdala in processing information related to both arousal and valence; we will focus mainly, but not exclusively, on processing related to valence.

The concept of positive and negative valence is related to recent work by neuroscientists seeking to understand the neural basis of economic choice. According to neuroeconomic theory, a ‘universal currency’ of value should be encoded in the brain in order to effectively compare different economic options [17, 18, 19]; moreover, the values of stimuli, the values of actions, and ‘state value’  the value of the overall situation of an organism at a given moment  are essential variables in theoretical accounts of learning [20, 21]. Using decision-making tasks, scientists have characterized neural signals correlated with value, where value is defined within an economic framework (reviewed in [18, 19]). In contrast, most studies focused on the amygdala have not used decision-making tasks; rather, they used classical or instrumental conditioning tasks, in which subjects learn the association between conditioned stimuli (CSs) and appetitive or aversive unconditioned stimuli (USs). Many types of associations between a CS and US may be formed during conditioning [22]  such as those between the CS and the motor response elicited by the US, or the sensory properties of the US  but, as we will discuss, considerable evidence now indicates that amygdala neurons encode information about the overall affective or motivational significance of USs associated with CSs. Therefore, we would argue that information about ‘valence’ encoded by the amygdala probably corresponds to ‘value’ as it is studied in decision-making tasks; we will use the terms ‘value’ and ‘valence’ interchangeably.

This review will examine recent progress in our understanding of whether and how value  in all its multifaceted senses  is encoded by the amygdala in rodents, humans, and non-human primates. We will consider the small but growing body of neurophysiological evidence concerning how the activity of individual amygdala neurons encodes the value of stimuli, and perhaps more general quantities, such as state value; and we will examine how this view of amygdala function may be supported by recent evidence from lesions and inactivation of the amygdala, and from observation of amygdala activity using functional imaging. Along the way, we will consider emerging ideas about how a representation of value might be ‘read out’ and used by other brain areas such as the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Overall, recent work paints a compelling picture of the amygdala as a key brain area for the processing and propagation of signals pertaining to value, and therefore as an essential part of the neural foundation of motivated behavior and emotion.

Section snippets

A neurophysiological representation of value

Until recent years, neurophysiological recording in the amygdala was mostly the province of rodents, with the exception of a few pioneering experiments in non-human primates [23, 24], and the majority of rodent studies were focused on fear conditioning. These studies helped to establish the viewpoint that the amygdala  particularly the lateral nucleus  is a key structure in Pavlovian conditioning, at least of the aversive valence, because it is a site of convergence for information about

Non-human primate studies

Lesions of the amygdala, which produce an extraordinarily wide range of behavioral and emotional effects, have historically provided a rich source of data about possible functions of the amygdala [45, 46] (reviewed in [47]). In recent years, neuroscientists working in rodents and non-human primates have used newer techniques  such as temporary pharmacological inactivation  to silence the amygdala, and those who work with lesions have increasingly used anatomically precise techniques that spare

The value signal in BOLD

Consistent with the historically prevalent view of the amygdala as a fear center, functional imaging studies in humans have often focused on the amygdala in the context of aversive events. Therefore, there is a large body of literature  including many ongoing research efforts  that connects increases in the blood-oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal in the amygdala to stimuli that induce fear or apprehension. Many studies have shown that activation of the amygdala is correlated with fear

Conclusions

Here we have reviewed the latest progress toward understanding how value may be represented in the amygdala. In neuroscience, the terminology of ‘value’ is used in a variety of ways  motivational value, incentive value, economic value, stimulus value, and action value, among others; however, it might be said that the idea of ‘state value’ subsumes and encompasses all of these concepts. The value of a ‘state’ takes into account not only external stimuli (including all the CSs and USs we have

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from NIMH (R01 MH082017 and RC1 MH088458), NIDA (R01 DA020656), NEI (R24 EY015634) and the James S McDonnell and Gatsby foundations. SEM received support from a National Science Foundation graduate fellowship and from an individual NIMH National Research Service Award (F31 MH081620). We wish to thank J Paton, M Belova, and members of the Salzman lab for helpful comments and discussions.

References (88)

  • C.D. Salzman et al.

    Flexible neural representations of value in the primate brain

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (2007)
  • R. Paz et al.

    Emotional enhancement of memory via amygdala-driven facilitation of rhinal interactions

    Nat Neurosci

    (2006)
  • K.M. Tye et al.

    Rapid strengthening of thalamo-amygdala synapses mediates cue-reward learning

    Nature

    (2008)
  • C. Herry et al.

    Switching on and off fear by distinct neuronal circuits

    Nature

    (2008)
  • C.J. Machado et al.

    Measuring reward assessment in a semi-naturalistic context: the effects of selective amygdala, orbital frontal or hippocampal lesions

    Neuroscience

    (2007)
  • E.A. Murray et al.

    Orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala contributions to affect and action in primates

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (2007)
  • A. Izquierdo et al.

    Selective bilateral amygdala lesions in rhesus monkeys fail to disrupt object reversal learning

    J Neurosci

    (2007)
  • P.H. Rudebeck et al.

    Amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex lesions differentially influence choices during object reversal learning

    J Neurosci

    (2008)
  • A. Olsson et al.

    Learning fears by observing others: the neural systems of social fear transmission

    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci

    (2007)
  • M.R. Munafo et al.

    Serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) genotype and amygdala activation: a meta-analysis

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • J. LeDoux

    The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala

    Cell Mol Neurobiol

    (2003)
  • D. Pare et al.

    New vistas on amygdala networks in conditioned fear

    J Neurophysiol

    (2004)
  • A.E. Wilensky et al.

    Functional inactivation of the amygdala before but not after auditory fear conditioning prevents memory formation

    J Neurosci

    (1999)
  • J.E. LeDoux

    Emotion circuits in the brain

    Ann Rev Neurosci

    (2000)
  • L. Stefanacci et al.

    Topographic organization of cortical inputs to the lateral nucleus of the macaque monkey amygdala: a retrograde tracing study

    J Comp Neurol

    (2000)
  • L. Stefanacci et al.

    Some observations on cortical inputs to the macaque monkey amygdala: an anterograde tracing study

    J Comp Neurol

    (2002)
  • J.L. Freese et al.

    The organization of projections from the amygdala to visual cortical areas TE and V1 in the macque monkey

    J Comp Neurol

    (2005)
  • M. Davis

    The role of the amygdala in conditioned and unconditioned fear and anxiety

  • J.A. Russell

    A circumplex model of affect

    J Personal Social Psychol

    (1980)
  • L.P. Sugrue et al.

    Choosing the greater of two goods: neural currencies for valuation and decision making

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2005)
  • A. Rangel et al.

    A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2008)
  • R. Sutton et al.

    Reinforcement Learning

    (1998)
  • P. Dayan et al.

    Theoretical Neuroscience

    (2001)
  • A.R. Delamater et al.

    Learning about multiple attributes of reward in Pavlovian conditioning

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (2007)
  • H. Nishijo et al.

    Single neuron responses in amygdala of alert monkey during complex sensory stimulation with affective significance

    J Neurosci

    (1988)
  • J. Paton et al.

    The primate amygdala represents the positive and negative value of visual stimuli during learning

    Nature

    (2006)
  • M.A. Belova et al.

    Moment-to-moment tracking of state value in the amygdala

    J Neurosci

    (2008)
  • S.E. Morrison et al.

    The convergence of information about rewarding and aversive stimuli in single neurons

    J Neurosci

    (2009)
  • M.A. Belova et al.

    Expectation modulates neural responses to pleasant and aversive stimuli in primate amygdala

    Neuron

    (2007)
  • C.M. Laine et al.

    Behavioral triggers of skin conductance responses and their neural correlates in the primate amygdala

    J Neurophysiol

    (2009)
  • K.M. Gothard et al.

    Neural responses to facial expression and face identity in the monkey amygdala

    J Neurophysiol

    (2007)
  • K. Kuraoka et al.

    Responses of single neurons in monkey amygdala to facial and vocal emotions

    J Neurophysiol

    (2007)
  • K.L. Hoffman et al.

    Facial-expression and gaze-selective responses in the monkey amygdala

    Curr Biol

    (2007)
  • S.J. Shabel et al.

    Substantial similarity in amygdala neuronal activity during conditioned appetitive and aversive emotional arousal

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text