Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 1188, 10 January 2008, Pages 76-86
Brain Research

Research Report
Communication call-evoked gamma-band activity in the auditory cortex of awake bats is modified by complex acoustic features

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.081Get rights and content

Abstract

Mustached bats emit an acoustically rich variety of calls for social communication. In the posterior primary auditory cortex, activity of neural ensembles measured as local field potentials (LFPs) can uniquely encode each call type. Here we report that LFPs recorded in response to calls contain oscillatory activity in the gamma-band frequency range (> 20 Hz). The power spectrum of these high-frequency oscillations shows either two peaks of energy (at 40 Hz and 100 Hz), or just one peak at 40 Hz. The relative power of gamma-band activity in the power spectrum of a call-evoked LFP correlates significantly with the ‘harmonic complexity’ of a call. Gamma-band activity is attenuated with reversal of frequency-modulated calls. Amplitude modulation, even when asymmetric across call reversals, has no significant effect on gamma-band activity. These results provide the first experimental evidence that complex features within different groups of species-specific calls modify the power spectrum of evoked gamma-band activity.

Introduction

Neural encoding of spectrotemporal information for recognition of complex acoustic signals, such as speech sounds, is not well understood. One approach to tackling this complex problem is to study the neural responses simultaneously at the single cell and population levels. At the population level, synchronous oscillations provide a powerful mechanism to integrate activity within a local population of neurons as well as across long range, functionally connected neural structures (König et al., 1995). High-frequency gamma-band oscillation-driven temporal coordination of activity at the surface of the auditory cortex was previously described in response to tonal clicks and amplitude-modulated sounds (Barth and MacDonald, 1996, Brosch et al., 2002, Franowicz and Barth, 1995, MacDonald and Barth, 1995). These studies were based on epidural recordings in lightly anesthetized rats. The term “gamma-band” traditionally referred to high-frequency activity that is 30 to 80 Hz. More recently, Crone and co-workers have extended the upper limit of gamma-band activity to ∼ 150 Hz based on subdural electrocorticographic recordings in humans and define oscillation activity > 70 Hz as “high gamma” (Sinai et al., 2005). Although a few recent studies implicate the role of gamma-band oscillations on speech sound perception in humans (Crone et al., 2001, Sinai et al., 2005), there is no information nor any direct evidence for their role in processing social or communication calls in animals.

Mustached bats use a number of call types for social interactions and have proven to be useful animal models for understanding the neural coding of complex acoustic signals both for echolocation and communication. The posterior primary auditory cortex (AIp) of mustached bats contains a representation of the frequencies (from 7 kHz to 50 kHz) that are present within all communication calls emitted by this species (Kanwal et al., 1994). A previous study showed that the temporal response pattern of neuronal ensembles and possibly single neurons in this region of the primary auditory cortex changes consistently for each call type and could carry sufficient information to uniquely encode each call type (Medvedev and Kanwal, 2004). Both, slow-wave, local field potentials (LFPs) and spiking activity at any locus within AIp were patterned after call-specific dynamics. This dynamic activity contributed to a distributed representation of 14 different call types. This mechanism of neural encoding is in contrast to the ‘combination sensitivity’ (nonlinear facilitation of neural responses to combinations of sound features) that is rampant in other auditory cortical areas of mustached bats and is also present in many other vertebrate species (Fuzessery and Feng, 1983, Margoliash and Fortune, 1992, Ohlemiller et al., 1996, Rauschecker and Tian, 2004, Suga et al., 1978).

Here we performed a spectral analysis on some of the same and newly acquired LFP and spiking data to examine the contribution of oscillatory activity in the neural coding of social calls. We recorded single-unit activity and event-related LFPs simultaneously and at the same locus in response to the presentation of each of 7 frequency-shifted variants of 14 different types of simple syllabic calls. LFPs were used to examine the presence of gamma-band activity (this study) in response to different simple syllabic call types that constitute a large part of the vocal repertoire of mustached bats (Kanwal et al., 1994). The major question we address in this study is whether LFPs contain stimulus-specific oscillatory activity. If so, what role does this activity play in the representation of calls? Can a component of this type of synchronous activity be detected within simultaneously recorded single-unit activity at the same locus?

Our results suggest that a majority of species-specific calls presented to awake bats trigger “gamma-band” (20–100 Hz), activity within local field potentials (LFPs) recorded from the AIp area. The activity range that we observe from intracortical recordings overlaps the so-called “low” and “high” gamma-band activity as well as high beta (20–30 kHz) as classified by others. We refer to the range of frequencies 20 to 100 Hz, studied in our experiments, as simply “gamma-band activity.” This frequency range appears to be a more natural and continuous range for the effects observed in mustached bats. We further show that the pattern of the power spectrum of evoked gamma-band activity present within LFPs can be used to classify different call types into at least three distinct groups. These patterns of neural activity could provide a basis for a perceptual classification of different call types. Single- and/or few-unit spiking activity, although generally too sparse to visibly show gamma-band oscillations, is significantly correlated with the LFP data. These results provide the first experimental data for a proposed role of stimulus-locked gamma-band activity in a “call recognition event” within a neural network (Hopfield and Brody, 2000, Hopfield and Brody, 2001). As discussed, call recognition may be achieved via oscillatory activity within a local population of neurons that leads to perceptual grouping of acoustic features within a complex sound.

Section snippets

Gamma-band components within LFP and spiking activity

Single- and few-unit activity as well as LFPs was recorded from more than 100 recording sites in the AIp area of six bats. A total of 98 call variants were presented to awake bats when recording from each locus. LFPs to all call types can be obtained at any recording site within the AIp of mustached bats (Medvedev and Kanwal, 2004). Different call types are uniquely encoded by the spectrotemporal patterns of responses within AIp. This can be observed by conducting an MDS analysis of both call

Discussion

Gamma-band oscillations were previously observed within olfactory and visual systems (Desmedt and Tomberg, 1994, Eckhorn et al., 1988, Engel et al., 1992, Fiser et al., 2004, Gevins et al., 1994, Gray and Singer, 1989, Ikegaya et al., 2004, Lam et al., 2003, Martin et al., 2004, Nikonov et al., 2002, Pulvermuller, 1996, Ribary et al., 1991, Sannita et al., 2001, Tiesinga and Sejnowski, 2004). In a few cases, gamma-band oscillations have also been observed in relation to motor behaviors (

Experimental procedures

The surgery, acoustic stimulation methods and recording of electrophysiological activity for these experiments are similar to those described previously (Kanwal et al., 1999) and are only briefly described here.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Ministry of Agriculture, Land and Marine Resources in Trinidad for permitting us to export mustached bats, and F. Muradali who assisted with the collection and exportation procedures. This research was supported by the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIH Grant R01 DC02054 to J.S.K.).

References (63)

  • P. Lakatos et al.

    Neuronal oscillations and multisensory interaction in primary auditory cortex

    Neuron

    (2007)
  • K.D. MacDonald et al.

    High frequency (gamma-band) oscillating potentials in rat somatosensory and auditory cortex

    Brain Res.

    (1995)
  • W.G. Sannita et al.

    Time dynamics of stimulus- and event-related gamma band activity: contrast-VEPs and the visual P300 in man

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2001)
  • M. Abeles et al.

    Spatiotemporal firing patterns in the frontal cortex of behaving monkeys

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1993)
  • D.S. Barth et al.

    Thalamic modulation of high-frequency oscillating potentials in auditory cortex

    Nature

    (1996)
  • M. Brosch et al.

    Stimulus-related gamma oscillations in primate auditory cortex

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2002)
  • P. Cariani

    Temporal coding of periodicity pitch in the auditory system: an overview

    Neural. Plast.

    (1999)
  • F. Crick

    Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1984)
  • M.O. Cunningham et al.

    A role for fast rhythmic bursting neurons in cortical gamma oscillations in vitro

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2004)
  • R.C. deCharms et al.

    Primary cortical representation of sounds by the coordination of action-potential timing

    Nature

    (1996)
  • R.C. deCharms et al.

    Neural representation and the cortical code

    Annu. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • J.P. Donoghue et al.

    Neural discharge and local field potential oscillations in primate motor cortex during voluntary movements

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1998)
  • R. Eckhorn et al.

    Coherent oscillations: a mechanism of feature linking in the visual cortex? Multiple electrode and correlation analyses in the cat

    Biol. Cybern.

    (1988)
  • J. Fiser et al.

    Small modulation of ongoing cortical dynamics by sensory input during natural vision

    Nature

    (2004)
  • M.N. Franowicz et al.

    Comparison of evoked potentials and high-frequency (gamma-band) oscillating potentials in rat auditory cortex

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1995)
  • Z.M. Fuzessery et al.

    Mating call selectivity in the thalamus of the leopard frog, (Rana pipiens): single and multiunit analyses

    J. Comp. Physiol.

    (1983)
  • R. Galambos

    A comparison of certain gamma band (40 Hz) brain rhythms in cat and man

  • C.M. Gray et al.

    Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1989)
  • N.G. Hatsopoulos et al.

    Information about movement direction obtained from synchronous activity of motor cortical neurons

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1998)
  • J.J. Hopfield et al.

    What is a moment? “Cortical” sensory integration over a brief interval

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2000)
  • J.J. Hopfield et al.

    What is a moment? Transient synchrony as a collective mechanism for spatiotemporal integration

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Low-Frequency Spike-Field Coherence Is a Fingerprint of Periodicity Coding in the Auditory Cortex

      2018, iScience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nevertheless, this does not imply that gamma oscillations do not participate in the encoding of sounds in the AC. An increase of gamma-band activity, linked to the processing of auditory stimuli, has been reported in humans (Pantev et al., 1991), non-human primates (Brosch et al., 2002), rats (Vianney-Rodrigues et al., 2011), and bats (Medvedev and Kanwal, 2008). Gamma-band oscillations in these studies (except for the one conducted on human subjects) were also correlated to some extent with neuronal spiking, something that we did not observe in our data (see Figures 2 and 3).

    • Ultrasonic Social Communication in Bats: Signal Complexity and Its Neural Management

      2018, Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similar neurophysiological studies hold the key to understanding the significantly more complex ultrasonic social communication in bats. Studies on the neural processing of bat communication signals, however, are still in their infancy but have already yielded some very interesting results (Esser, Condon, Suga, & Kanwal, 1997; Medvedev & Kanwal, 2008; Ohlemiller, Kanwal, & Suga, 1996). It is clear that sounds used for communication are far more complex than those used for echolocation; also, much less is known about the behavioral significance of the different sounds.

    • Auditory gamma and beta oscillations

      2013, Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is attenuated when significant changes are intended or predicted, or is otherwise increased in pathological conditions with a resulting inadequate functional flexibility, as e.g. in Parkinson’s disease (Androulidakis et al., 2008; Mallet et al., 2008; McCarthy et al., 2011; see Engel and Fries, 2010, for reference). Gamma oscillations have been implicated in the coding of complex acoustic features (Medvedev and Kanwal, 2008), and they are recorded within the primary auditory (A1) cortex (Brett and Barth, 1997) in response to pure tones (Fig. 1). Some studies did not record tone-triggered gamma oscillations in the awake rat (Cotillon-Williams and Edeline, 2003) or bat (Horikawa et al., 1994), others showed that both social calls and tones trigger prominent gamma oscillation in A1 of the awake bat and monkey (Medvedev and Kanwal, 2008; Steinschneider et al., 2008).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text