Functional improvement and neurogenesis after collagen-GAG matrix implantation into surgical brain trauma
Introduction
Surgical or traumatic brain injury may cause serious long term neurological deficits [1]. The brain is fragile, but unlike other tissues has a limited capacity to regenerate upon being damaged. Current management strategies for brain injury are mainly focused on neuroprotection such as preventing tissue loss with pharmacological agents, but these still demonstrate poor long term outcomes [2], [3]. To date, there is no clinical intervention to promote tissue regeneration after brain injury [4], [5], [6]. But recent reports regarding progress of brain injury repair disclose some newly developed strategies based on the concept of neurogenesis in the adult brain [7]. It is known that the lack of regeneration in the brain might arise from the complex cellular and molecular environment in the damaged area and the lack of structural continuity, which makes cellular adhesion impossible. Implanting a scaffold into the lesion cavity to provide supporting substrates contributes to cell infiltration and axon outgrowth and may also be used for delivery of growth factors to promote axon regeneration [8].
Tissue engineering scaffolds, as analogs of the extracellular matrix (ECM), are used extensively in the body and were initially thought to only provide physical support structure for tissues [9]. Under normal conditions,the ECM makes up about one-fifth of the normal brain [10], and has a unique composition in the CNS as it contains relatively small amounts of fibrous proteins (collagens, laminins and fibronectin) with high amounts of linear polysaccharides (glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) such as hyaluronan, chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate) [11], [12], [13]. In addition, CNS resident cells including endothelial cells, astrocytes, neurons, microglia and others can synthesize and secrete ECM proteins [14]. It is known that in adults the ECM not only provides physical support for CNS resident cells, but also regulates ionic and nutritional homeostasis [12]. At present, scaffolds constructed from type I collagen and GAG (CG) have already been used for a variety of regenerative processes in vivo and cell migration in vitro. In addition, CG scaffolds were previously used to induce regeneration of the skin, conjunctiva, cartilage, bone and peripheral nerves in vivo [15], [16], [17], [18]. However, the use of CG scaffolds in the brain has not yet been well studied. The structural characteristics of the biomaterial and its speed of degradation are both critical factors in determining the successful outcome of wound repair when using tissue engineering scaffolds. A three-dimensional (3-D) scaffold can provide a microenvironment for cell migration and so facilitate the wound healing process.
In this study, we cross-linked collagen-GAG by immersing it in a glutaraldehyde solution for 24 h to maintain its 3-D structure until post-operative day 28, when it degraded completely. We hypothesized that the implantation of the ECM analog at the site of the cortical lesion would promote cell migration and differentiation and thus facilitate functional recovery. To test this hypothesis, our study was designed to evaluate the effects of the CG scaffold implantation following surgical brain trauma.
Section snippets
Preparation of scaffold (Synthesis of CG copolymer matrix)
The biodegradable collagen matrix of 1% collagen/0.02% GAG copolymer matrices were produced as previously described [16], [19], [20]. Briefly, a coprecipitate of type I porcine tendon (SPF, Animal Technology Institute Taiwan) and chondroitin 6-sulfate (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO) in 0.05 m acetic acid was freeze-dried to yield a highly porous sheet 4 mm in thickness. The freeze-drying process yielded a network of CG copolymer with approximately 95% pore volume fraction and average
Cell migration into CG matrix
Fig. 1 shows the appearance of brains on day 0 and day 7 following surgery from animals with experimental surgical traumatic brain lesion (L) and with L then followed by implantation of CG matrix (L + CG) (Fig. 1A). Cross-sectional slicing revealed lesion areas in the L + CG animal were smaller than that in L animal (Fig. 1C). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained coronal sections indicated cavity formation and deformation of the cerebral cortex with ipsilateral lateral ventricle dilation in an L
Discussion
Employing an animal model of surgical brain trauma, we have demonstrated that CG matrix implantation into a traumatic cavity can promote lesion repair and functional improvement. We also show histological evidence of cell migration into the IMZ in the L + CG group of animals. Significant increases in cell density within the LBZ of L + CG group was noted as compared to sham or L group. Astrocytes were found only in the LBZ and the proliferative cells are not astrocytes. In the LBZ and the IMZ,
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that CG matrix by itself improves functional recovery, increases cell proliferation and also promotes differentiation and migration of endogenous neural precursor cells and increases tissue concentration of BDNF and GDNF after surgical brain trauma in rats. Consequently, the study suggests a potential clinical role for the CG matrix in promoting CNS regeneration after surgical brain trauma.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Council (NSC 99-2320-B-038-006-MY3 to JY Wang) and from the Buddhist Tzu-Chi General Hospital Taipei branch (TCRD-TPE-100-35 to KF Huang) at Taipei, Taiwan, without conflict of interest. We would like to thank Ms. Jia-Hsun Lee and Dr. Shun-Yuan Jiang for data collection and analysis.
References (46)
Neuroprotection in traumatic brain injury
Drug Discov Today
(2008)- et al.
Multimodal monitoring in traumatic brain injury: current status and future directions
Br J Anaesth
(2007) - et al.
CNS injury, glial scars, and inflammation: Inhibitory extracellular matrices and regeneration failure
Exp Neurol
(2008) - et al.
Mechanical characterization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds
Acta Biomater
(2007) - et al.
Extracellular matrix and the brain: components and function
J Clin Neurosci
(2000) - et al.
From barriers to bridges: chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in neuropathology
Trends Mol Med
(2006) - et al.
In vivo and in vitro applications of collagen-GAG scaffolds
Chem Eng J
(2008) - et al.
Microarchitecture of three-dimensional scaffolds influences cell migration behavior via junction interactions
Biophys J
(2008) - et al.
Forebrain neurogenesis after focal ischemic and traumatic brain injury
Neurobiol Dis
(2010) - et al.
The utility of Ki-67 and BrdU as proliferative markers of adult neurogenesis
J Neurosci Methods
(2002)
Vascular endothelial growth factor promotes brain tissue regeneration with a novel biomaterial polydimethylsiloxane-tetraethoxysilane
Brain Res
The repair of brain lesion by implantation of hyaluronic acid hydrogels modified with laminin
J Neurosci Methods
Roles of the mammalian subventricular zone in cell replacement after brain injury
Prog Neurobiol
BDNF function in adult synaptic plasticity: the synaptic consolidation hypothesis
Prog Neurobiol
Intraventricular administration of BDNF increases the number of newly generated neurons in the adult olfactory bulb
Mol Cell Neurosci
The promotion of cerebral ischemia recovery in rats by laminin-binding BDNF
Biomaterials
Compatibility of human fetal neural stem cells with hydrogel biomaterials in vitro
Brain Res
Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury
Mt Sinai J Med
Pharmacological enhancement of cognitive and behavioral deficits after traumatic brain injury
Curr Opin Neurol
Traumatic brain injury: the importance of rehabilitation and treatment
Mo Med
Neurogenesis and brain injury: managing a renewable resource for repair
J Clin Invest
Biomaterials for the central nervous system
J R Soc Interface
Hyaluronic acid and hyaluronic acid-binding proteins in brain extracellular matrix
Anat Embryol (Berl)
Cited by (45)
Pioneering a paradigm shift in tissue engineering and regeneration with polysaccharides and proteins-based scaffolds: A comprehensive review
2024, International Journal of Biological MacromoleculesCollagen for neural tissue engineering: Materials, strategies, and challenges
2023, Materials Today BioIn vivo evaluation of biomaterials for neural tissue engineering
2023, Biomaterials for Neural Tissue EngineeringBiomaterials based growth factor delivery for brain regeneration after injury
2022, Smart Materials in MedicineNatural biomaterials in brain repair: A focus on collagen
2021, Neurochemistry InternationalFabrication, applications and challenges of natural biomaterials in tissue engineering
2020, Applied Materials TodayCitation Excerpt :The blending of natural biopolymers with natural/synthetic biopolymers have the advantage to obtain ECM mimic biomaterials [114,175,180]. Furthermore, physical and chemical crosslinking treatments are used to improve mechanical properties and biostability [118,166,167,178,180,186,212]. Many reports are available on the improvement of mechanical properties and biostability of natural biomaterials (Table 3).