Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 31, Issue 7, March 2010, Pages 1691-1698
Biomaterials

Differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells grown in terpolyesters of 3-hydroxyalkanoates scaffolds into nerve cells

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.053Get rights and content

Abstract

Polyhydroxyalkanoates, abbreviated as PHA, have been studied for medical applications due to their suitable mechanical properties, blood and tissue tolerance and in vivo biodegradability. As a new member of PHA family, terpolyester of 3-hydroxybutyrate, 3-hydroxyvalerate and 3-hydroxyhexanoate, abbreviated as PHBVHHx, was compared with polylactic acid (PLA), copolyester of 3-hydroxybutyrate and 3-hydroxyhexanoate (PHBHHx) for their respective functions leading to differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (hBMSC) into nerve cells. Results indicated that 3D scaffolds promoted the differentiation of hBMSC into nerve cells more intensively compared with 2D films. Smaller pore sizes of scaffolds increased differentiation of hBMSC into nerve cells, whereas decreased cell proliferation. PHBVHHx scaffolds with pore sizes of 30–60 μm could be used in nerve tissue engineering for treatment of nerve injury. The above results were supported by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and confocal microscopy observation on attachment and growth of hBMSCs on PLA, PHBHHx and PHBVHHx, and by CCK-8 evaluation of cell proliferation. In addition, expressions of nerve markers nestin, GFAP and β-III tubulin of nerve cells differentiated from hBMSC grown in PHBVHHx scaffolds were confirmed by real-time PCR.

Introduction

The gold standard for treatment of nerve defects is to bridge the peripheral nerve gap with an autograft [1]. However, limitations still exist in these repairs of nerve injuries, partly because of the limited availability of donor tissues and partly due to the severity of the local pain suffered at the donor operative site [2]. Despite the good surgical advances, functional recovery was often poor [3], [4]. The development of biomaterials for stem cell carriers has been regarded as a useful source of alternative tissue equivalents that provide a favorable microenvironment for tissue regeneration [5]. Tissue engineering techniques which enhance the beneficial endogenous responses to nerve injury could provide an alternative repair strategy [3].

Human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSC) can continuously self-renew and differentiate into nerve cells in vitro under certain conditions [6]. There are also many evidences showing that hBMSC may be non-immunogenic or hypo-immunogenic [7]. hBMSC transplanted at sites of nerve injury are thought to promote functional recovery by producing trophic factors that induce survival and regeneration of host neurons [8]. Many researchers have attempted to regenerate nerve tissue by combining suitable biomaterials with hBMSC [9]. Artificial nerve scaffolds with cell and tissue compatibility have been used as carriers of cells to improve regeneration for nerve injury repair [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. In the last few years, various biodegradable and non-biodegradable scaffolds have been tested using different experimental models of nerve injury [12], [13]. In rat hemi-section spinal cord injury model, PLGA scaffolds with neural stem cell were implanted into the injured site, resulted in a functional improvement. Tissue loss and glial scarring were reduced by transplantation [14].

PHA, with their biocompatibility, biodegradability and strong mechanical properties, have been widely investigated for tissue engineering applications. Previous studies showed that PHB and PHBHHx could be used as potential candidate materials for peripheral nerve tissue engineering [15], [16]. Novikova et al. demonstrated that a PHB scaffold promoted attachment, proliferation and survival of adult Schwann cells, and supported marked axonal regeneration within the graft [16]. An ideal scaffold should have a high affinity for cells to attach and proliferate, should be compatible to in vivo tissues and blood, should have durable strength. PHBHHx appears to be a material meeting these requirements [17]. Similar to PHBHHx, PHBVHHx is a new member of PHA family, our previous study showed that PHBVHHx had better biocompatibility compared with tissue cuture plates (TCP), PLA and PHBHHx [18]. Based on this finding, it had become interesting to investigate the possibility of PHBVHHx for hBMSC proliferation and differentiation.

Scaffold spatial structures have been shown to have effects on cell proliferation and differentiation in 3D directions [19]. In this study, porous PHBVHHx scaffolds intended for nerve tissue engineering were fabricated using thermally induced phase separation (TIPS), and these scaffolds with different pore sizes were studied for hBMSC proliferation and differentiation.

Section snippets

Cell isolation and culture

Human bone marrow samples were acquired from donors (5–36 years old) without metabolic diseases at First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College. The patients were informed and agreed on the sampling and the purposes, and local Ethical Committee approval was obtained for the use of the samples for this research. hBMSC cell isolation and culture were performed as previously described [20]. In brief, bone marrow samples were layered over a lymphoprep gradient and centrifuged at

Characterization of hBMSC

Human bone marrow mononuclear cells were isolated using density gradient centrifugation. The resuspended cells were seeded in cell culture plates. Non-adherent hematopoietic cells were removed. When adherent cells grew to confluence, they were harvested and passaged. Flow cytometry study was performed to characterize surface markers on mesenchymal stem cells. The hBMSC expressed CD73, CD90 and CD105 without expression of CD34 (hematopoietic lineage marker), CD45 and HLA-DR (Fig. 1). These hBMSC

Discussion

PHA have attracted increasing interest as tissue engineering materials due to their adjustable physical properties, biodegradability and good biocompatibility [32], [33], [34]. Copolyesters PHBHHx have been reported as a potential implant material [15]. In vitro studies demonstrated that PHBHHx has good compatibility for several cells including fibroblasts, chondrocytes and osteoblasts [22], [35], [36].

Recently terpolyester PHBVHHx was revealed to have stronger cell adhesion and proliferation

Conclusion

Terpolyester PHBVHHX films showed stronger cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation for hBMSC compared with that of well studied PLA and PHBHHx. PHBVHHx scaffolds immersed in nerve differentiation medium were shown to promote hBMSC differentiation compared with their 2D cultures. PHBVHHx scaffolds prepared at −80 °C provided pore sizes of 30–60 μm, these revealed the most suitable environment for cell proliferation and nerve differentiation from hBMSC. PHBVHHx scaffolds with right pore

Acknowledgement

We thank Mr. Pu-Chang Lie, Mr. Hai-Qiang Zhu, Professor Xing Wei for helping the hBMSC isolation, growth and characterization. This work was supported by the Li Ka-Shing Foundation. The National High Tech 863 Grant (Project no. 2006AA02Z242) supported the PHBVHHx production. Also, GQC was supported by 973 Basic Research Fund (Grant No. 2007CB707804) and Guangdong Provincial Grant for collaboration among industry, university and research organization.

References (47)

  • Y. Xiong et al.

    Synaptic transmission of neural stem cells seeded in 3-dimensional PLGA scaffolds

    Biomaterials

    (2009)
  • Y.Z. Bian et al.

    Evaluation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration

    Biomaterials

    (2009)
  • L.N. Novikov et al.

    A novel biodegradable implant for neuronal rescue and regeneration after spinal cord injury

    Biomaterials

    (2002)
  • X.H. Qu et al.

    Enhanced vascular-related cellular affinity on surface modified copolyesters of 3-hydroxybutyrate and 3-hydroxyhexanoate (PHBHHx)

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • Y.J. Hu et al.

    Biocompatibility of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

    Acta Biomater

    (2009)
  • S. Taqvi et al.

    Influence of scaffold physical properties and stromal cell coculture on hematopoietic differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells

    Biomaterials

    (2006)
  • Y.W. Wang et al.

    Reduced mouse fibroblast cell growth by increased hydrophilicity of microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates via hyaluronan coating

    Biomaterials

    (2003)
  • P.X. Ma

    Scaffolds for tissue fabrication

    Mater Today

    (2004)
  • Y. Ji et al.

    Interactions between a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) terpolyester and human keratinocytes

    Biomaterials

    (2008)
  • S.T. Cheng et al.

    The expression of cross-linked elastin by rabbit blood vessel smooth muscle cells cultured in polyhydroxyalkanoate scaffolds

    Biomaterials

    (2008)
  • B.B. Mandal et al.

    Cell proliferation and migration in silk fibroin 3D scaffolds

    Biomaterials

    (2009)
  • L.A. Smith et al.

    The influence of three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffolds on the osteogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cells

    Biomaterials

    (2009)
  • K.M. Safford et al.

    Characterization of neuronal/glial differentiation of murine adipose-derived adult stromal cells

    Exp Neurol

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text