Neurotransmitter transporters as molecular targets for addictive drugs

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(98)00068-4Get rights and content

Introduction

The inhibition of biogenic amine transport can have profound behavioral and physiological consequences, and accordingly, the vesicular and plasma membrane monoamine carriers have been recognized as important targets for a wide variety of clinically important antidepressant, antihypertensive and psychostimulant drugs. Initial studies of neurotransmitter uptake systems in brain slices, synaptosomes and plasma membrane vesicles demonstrated a variety of activities that could be distinguished not only on the basis of their kinetic properties and specific ionic requirements, but also by their sensitivity to selective antagonists (reviewed by Amara and Arriza, 1993, Amara and Kuhar, 1993, Rudnick and Clark, 1993, Brownstein and Hoffman, 1994). A basic premise for the actions of psychostimulants, such as cocaine and amphetamines has been that these drugs act acutely to block transport, thus elevating extracellular concentrations of the biogenic amine neurotransmitters dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin, and thereby potentiating the activation of post-synaptic receptors (Fig. 1). Psychostimulants, such as amphetamines also act on a class of monoamine transporters on synaptic vesicles to promote the release of stored amines into the cytoplasm. As outlined in several of the reviews in this volume, many complex neurobiological and behavioral issues need to be considered before the biology of psychomotor stimulant addiction can be understood at a systems level. However, significant insights continue to come from investigations into the fundamental biology of the transporters themselves. This review will focus on recent developments in our understanding of the structure, mechanistic features and physiological contributions of monoamine transporters as they relate to the actions of psychostimulant drugs of abuse.

Two gene families are involved in the transport of the biogenic amines — the Na+/Cl-dependent plasma membrane carriers and the H+-dependent vesicular amine carriers. Molecular cloning studies have demonstrated that the plasma membrane transporters for the monoamines, such as norepinephrine (Pacholczyk et al., 1991), dopamine (Giros et al., 1991, Kilty et al., 1991, Shimada et al., 1991, Usdin et al., 1991), and serotonin (Blakely et al., 1991, Hoffman et al., 1991) are members of a large family of Na+/Cl-dependent transporters which also includes the carriers for GABA, proline, glycine, creatine, betaine, taurine and other organic substrates (reviewed by Amara and Arriza, 1993, Amara and Kuhar, 1993, Rudnick and Clark, 1993, Brownstein and Hoffman, 1994). A universal feature of this class of transport proteins is that substrate entry is coupled to the inward cotransport of sodium ions, which provide the energetic driving force for accumulation within the cell. A second structurally distinct group of carriers catalyzes the movement of monoamines from the cytoplasm into secretory and synaptic vesicles. For these vesicular monoamine carriers, substrate transport is thermodynamically coupled to the outward movement of protons across the vesicle membrane (Edwards, 1992, Schuldiner, 1994, Liu and Edwards, 1997).

The molecular characterization of plasma membrane carriers began with the purification, amino acid sequencing and cloning of a rat GABA transporter (GAT1) (Guastella et al., 1990) and was extended with the expression cloning of the human norepinephrine transporter (NET) (Pacholczyk et al., 1991). A comparison of the predicted amino acid sequence of GAT1 and NET revealed a high degree of sequence homology which became the basis for identifying cDNAs encoding the dopamine (DAT) and serotonin (SERT) transporters. Although at least four different subtypes of GABA carriers have been identified (Liu et al., 1993) the three biogenic amine transporters, NET, DAT and SERT, appear to be encoded by single genes. Sequence-based predictions have been made for the transmembrane topology and structure of the different family members, but the proposed models have not been fully verified by experiments. Based on analyses of hydrophobicity, proteins in the Na+- and Cl-dependent transporter family are best described by a model with 12 transmembrane domains (TMs), intracellular amino- and carboxyl-termini, and a large extracellular loop with multiple N-linked glycosylation sites between the TM3 and TM4 (Brüss et al., 1995, Vaughan and Kuhar, 1996, Clark, 1997, Hersch et al., 1997) (Fig. 2). Members of the Na+- and Cl-dependent transporters have no close sequence similarities with any other major carrier family, including the excitatory amino acid transporters that catalyze the transport of glutamate in the vertebrate CNS (Amara and Arriza, 1993, Attwell and Mobbs, 1994).

Section snippets

Vesicular monoamine carrier family

A novel expression strategy was utilized for the cloning of a monoamine carrier (Liu et al., 1992b). The expression of a vesicular monoamine carrier confers resistance to MPP+, the toxic metabolite of MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) by sequestering MPP+ into vesicles, thereby limiting the toxic actions of the compound on mitochondrial function. This property became the basis for selection of cells expressing a cDNA encoding a vesicular monoamine transport activity exhibiting

Lessons from transporter knockouts

Cocaine is a moderately potent antagonist of all three biogenic amine transporters, but the addictive and euphoric properties of the drug have been attributed to inhibition of dopamine reuptake in the nucleus accumbens and other targets of the mesolimbic dopamine system. This focus on the dopamine transporter as the primary target for the effects of cocaine has been supported by self-administration studies, in which reinforcing properties of cocaine and related drugs correlate with their

VMAT-2 knockouts — supersensitivity and quantal release

The targeted disruption of the gene encoding VMAT2, the predominant vesicular monoamine carrier in brainstem and midbrain regions, not only confirms the importance of VMAT for behavior and monoamine content but also reveals the tight linkage between transporter expression and the amount of neurotransmitter stored within each synaptic vesicle (Fon et al., 1997, Takahashi et al., 1997, Wang et al., 1997). Although their brains appear grossly normal and monoaminergic cell group and pathways appear

Structure–function relationships and drug action

The sequence conservation among the transporters for dopamine and norepinephrine has guided the study of transporter functions. Studies of site-specific transporter mutants and chimeric proteins have pointed to amino acids and domains involved in substrate specificity and psychostimulant interactions. The analysis of chimeras has provided correlative information on the domains that contribute to the unique properties of each carrier, such as its specificity for different substrates or its

Transporter-mediated currents and drug actions

Monoamine transport across the plasma membrane involves the cotransport of additional ions along with neurotransmitter. Depending on the net charge of substrates and ions translocated, the process could be expected to be electrogenic. Estimates of the ionic stoichiometry of monoamine carriers have come predominantly from experiments measuring the ionic dependence of initial rates of substrate transport. Earlier work examining the ionic dependence of activation of [3H]substrate transport

Summary

The neurotransmitter dopamine lies at or near the center of current theories of drug abuse and dependence. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that dopaminergic cells play key roles in a variety of motivated behaviors. Accordingly, it is not surprising that cocaine and amphetamines — some of the most widely used illicit drugs—elevate extraneuronal dopamine concentrations through their actions on the plasma membrane dopamine transporter. From the point of view of developing novel pharmacological

Acknowledgements

Work in the Amara laboratory was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, NIH grants DA07595 and NS33273 to S.G.A. and a NARSAD award to M.S.S. We thank M. Kevin Poth, Rebecca Seal, Geoffrey Murdoch and Gursharn Khatra for their comments on the manuscript.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (76)

  • E.A. Fon et al.

    Vesicular transport regulates monoamine storage and release but is not essential for amphetamine action

    Neuron

    (1997)
  • B. Giros et al.

    Cloning and functional characterization of a cocaine-sensitive dopamine transporter

    FEBS Lett.

    (1991)
  • B. Giros et al.

    Delineation of discrete domains for substrate, cocaine, and tricyclic antidepressant interactions using chimeric dopamine-norepinephrine transporters

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1994)
  • F. Lin et al.

    Single-channel currents produced by the serotonin transporter and analysis of a mutation affecting ion permeation

    Biophys. J.

    (1996)
  • Q.-R. Liu et al.

    Molecular characterization of four pharmacologically distinct γ-amminobutyric acid transporters in mouse brain

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1993)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    A cDNA that suppresses MPP+ toxicity encodes a vesicular amine transporter

    Cell

    (1992)
  • S. Mager et al.

    Conducting states of a mammalian serotonin transporter

    Neuron

    (1994)
  • S. Mager et al.

    Steady states, charge movements, and rates for a cloned GABA transporter expressed in Xenopus oocytes

    Neuron

    (1993)
  • A. Merickel et al.

    Charged residues in transmembrane domains II and XI of a vesicular monoamine transporter form a charge pair that promotes high affinity substrate recognition

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1997)
  • D. Peter et al.

    The chromaffin granule and synaptic vesicle amine transporters differ in substrate recognition and sensitivity to inhibitors

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1994)
  • D. Peter et al.

    Chimeric vesicular monoamine transporters identify structural domains that influence substrate affinity and sensitivity to tetrabenazine

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1996)
  • G. Rudnick et al.

    From synapse to vesicle: the reuptake and storage of biogenic amine neurotransmitters

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1993)
  • M.S. Sonders et al.

    Channels in transporters

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (1996)
  • D. Sulzer et al.

    Amphetamine and other psychostimulants reduce pH gradients in midbrain dopaminergic neurons and chromaffin granules: a mechanism of action

    Neuron

    (1990)
  • C. Sur et al.

    The rat serotonin transporter: identification of cysteine residues important for substrate transport

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1997)
  • H. Varoqui et al.

    Cloning and expression of the vesamicol binding protein from the marine ray Torpedo. Homology with the putative vesicular acetylcholine transporter UNC-17 from Caenorhabditis elegans

    FEBS Lett.

    (1994)
  • R.A. Vaughan et al.

    Dopamine transporter ligand binding domains

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1996)
  • Y.-M. Wang et al.

    Knockout of the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 gene results in neonatal death and supersensitivity to cocaine and amphetamine

    Neuron

    (1997)
  • R.A. Wise

    Neurobiology of addiction

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (1996)
  • S.G. Amara et al.

    Neurotransmitter transporters: recent progress

    Ann. Rev. Neurosci.

    (1993)
  • E.L. Barker et al.

    Identification of a single amino acid, phenylalanine 586, that is responsible for high affinity interactions of tricyclic antidepressants with the human serotonin transporter

    Mol. Pharmacol.

    (1996)
  • E.L. Barker et al.

    Chimeric human and rat serotonin transporters reveal domains involved in recognition of transporter ligands

    Mol. Pharmacol.

    (1994)
  • R.D. Blakely et al.

    Cloning and expression of a functional serotonin transporter from rat brain

    Nature

    (1991)
  • K. Buck et al.

    Chimeric dopamine-norepinephrine transporters delineate structural domains influencing selectivity for catecholamines and 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1994)
  • K.J. Buck et al.

    Structural domains of catecholamine transporter chimeras involved in selective inhibition by antidepressants and psychomotor stimulants

    Mol. Pharmacol.

    (1995)
  • Y. Cao et al.

    H+ Permeation and pH regulation at a mammalian serotonin transporter

    J. Neurosci.

    (1997)
  • J.-G. Chen et al.

    External cysteine residues in the serotonin transporter

    Biochemistry

    (1997)
  • J. Erickson et al.

    Functional identification and molecular cloning of a human brain vesicle monoamine transporter

    J. Neurochem.

    (1993)
  • Cited by (224)

    • Expression of immediate early genes in brain reward circuitries: Differential regulation by psychostimulant and opioid drugs

      2019, Neurochemistry International
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although some of the clinical manifestations of SUDs might be superficially similar, it is likely that different classes of abused drugs including opioids (heroin, morphine, and oxycodone, other opioids) and psychostimulants (cocaine and amphetamines) (Hedegaard et al., 2017) may cause different neuroadaptations in various brain regions dependent in the distribution and concentration of their biochemical sites of actions. For example, psychostimulants interact primarily with monoaminergic transporters including those for dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), and serotonin (5-HT) (Amara and Sonders, 1998) whereas opioids stimulate opioid receptors (Kreek et al., 2012). Mesocortical circuitries that subserve basic and critical biological functions including decision-making, goal-oriented behaviors, and motor outputs related to reward is thought to potentially mediate the addictive properties of addictive drugs (Koob and Volkow, 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text