Elsevier

Physiology & Behavior

Volume 69, Issues 1–2, 1–15 April 2000, Pages 187-201
Physiology & Behavior

Articles
Patterns in the brain: Neuronal population coding in the somatosensory system

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00201-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this article is to review some basic principles of neural coding, with an emphasis on mechanisms of stimulus representation in ensembles of neurons. The theory of “across-neuron response patterns” (ANRPs), first suggested by Thomas Young (1802) and fully developed by Robert Erickson (1963–2000), is summarized and applied to the problem of coding in primary afferent fibers and cortical neurons of the somatosensory system. The basic premise of the theory is that precise information about stimulus features cannot be encoded by single neurons, but is encoded by patterns of activity across populations of neurons. Different stimuli produce uniquely different patterns of ensemble activity (ANRPs)—discrimination between two stimuli is based on the absolute difference in total amount of activity (neural mass difference) of the ANRPs for those stimuli. Review of the literature shows that ANRPs and related population codes can accurately represent and differentiate among various stimulus parameters that cannot be distinguished by single neurons alone. Finally, the behavior of neuronal ensembles can be used to account for the sensory-perceptual changes associated with plasticity of thalamocortical circuits following selective sensorimotor deprivation or experience.

Introduction

The sense of touch constitutes the interface between the external world of objects and our internal world of self. It is both an active sense for exploring and manipulating the environment, and a passive sense for receiving touch that can stir the emotions as well as inform. Unlike other senses, touch is simultaneously given and received by simple mutual contact of the skin. It is a young girl caressing her silken, gray cat, a carpenter feeling the grain of his newly carved table, a physician palpating a sensitive abdomen, a lover's touch that leads to a kiss, a blind man fingering a pattern of raised dots in order to “see.”

How does this sense of touch come about? What are the neural mechanisms responsible for the rich variety of somatosensory experiences? As G. E. Smith [107] observed “… all the kaleidoscopic manifestations of mental activity are dependent upon, and determined by, physiological processes taking place in the nervous system.” But what is the nature of those processes, especially as they apply to somesthesis? The aim of this review is to address those questions, based primarily on the author's own research in sensory processing and on related neural coding studies by others. The review concentrates on stimulus coding by populations (ensembles) of neurons and is limited mainly to discussion of the somatosensory system.

The history of neural coding is marked by a pervasive tension between two seemingly contradictory ideas—that different sensory functions are mediated by activation of distinctly different neurons with highly specific stimulus sensitivities, or that different functions are represented by unique patterns of activity in populations of neurons with relatively broad stimulus sensitivities. The “specificity” theory had its origins in Johannes Müller's doctrine of “specific nerve energies” [79], which emphasized the unique functional characteristics of the nerves mediating different sense modalities. That doctrine was subsequently extended by von Helmholtz [48] and von Frey [39] to become the principle of “specific fiber energies,” which held that each stimulus submodality or quality within a sense modality is encoded by excitation of different specific nerve fibers or neurons. The modern version of this theory is often referred to as the “labeled-line” code. Support for this view was driven largely by new electrophysiological techniques that made it possible to determine the physiological properties, response characteristics, and receptive fields of individual neurons. The predominance of the specificity idea is exemplified by the ubiquitous phrase, “place- and modality-specific neurons,” in the neuroscience literature. This notion is also reflected in various proposals for different classes of cells signaling “touch, vibration, pain, cold, position, movement, etc.” in somesthesis, “red, green, edge, orientation, direction of movement, etc.” in vision, and “salty, sweet, sour, etc.” in gustation. With its emphasis on individual cells, the labeled-line notion has been explicitly or implicitly advocated by many investigators 4, 19, 38, 52, 64, 66, 76, 78, 90, 93, 94, 95.

In contrast, the “pattern” theory had its origins in the theory of color vision proposed by Thomas Young [124] and elaborated by von Helmholtz [49]. The theory stated that the retina contains three different receptors that are broadly, but differentially, sensitive to all portions of the spectrum—any wavelength of light (color) can thus be uniquely represented by the ratios of responses across the different types of receptors. This basic idea was adopted in varying form or developed independently by others including Adrian et al. [3], Pfaffmann 91, 92, Weddell [118], Erickson 25, 26, Towe [111], Mountcastle 76, 78, Doetsch and Erickson [14], John [56], Doetsch and Towe [15], Whitfield [120], Ray and Doetsch [99], and Nicolelis et al. 82, 83. In the modern period, Pfaffmann [92] was the first to make a formal statement of the pattern theory in his description of gustatory coding; surprisingly, he later adopted a position more consistent with the labeled-line theory [93]. However, it was Robert Erickson [25] who put the matter most succinctly: “… the neural message for gustatory quality is a pattern made up of the amount of neural activity across many neural elements.” Erickson 23, 24, 26, 27 then proceeded to develop this notion into a comprehensive theory, and extended its application to all sensory, motor, and cognitive systems of the brain, suggesting that “across-neuron response patterns” constitute the fundamental language of the nervous system. The basic difference between the two theories is illustrated schematically in Fig. 1.

Some versions of the pattern theory tended to neglect the role of specialized receptors and neurons, suggesting that different patterns of excitation in space and time were the sole determinants of different sensory experiences 80, 118. This view was later modified to include the role of differentially sensitive receptors and central neurons 70, 106. In contrast, the original Young–Helmholtz theory did not have this problem, because it explicitly required different types of retinal receptors. Likewise, the pattern theory developed by Erickson 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 demands the existence of differentially tuned neural elements at all levels of the nervous system, from receptors to cerebral cortex. Furthermore, the theory incorporates the idea of specificity in terms of anatomically and functionally distinct systems mediating different sensory, motor, and cognitive processes. Hence, neural specificity, within certain broad limits, and population coding are not mutually exclusive. A peripheral nerve, nucleus, or brain area is developmentally specified to perform or contribute to certain functions (such as somatosensory or visual perception)—but precise coding of information within that anatomical/functional entity is accomplished by patterns of activity across neuronal populations that are unique for each sensory-perceptual experience (see [89] for a catalogue of candidate neural codes).

Section snippets

Theory of coding by across-neuron response patterns

The central principle of the across-neuron response pattern (ANRP) theory, sometimes referred to as the “across-fiber pattern” theory 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, is that information is encoded by neuronal populations and not by individual neurons. More specifically, precise information is represented in the nervous system by spatiotemporal patterns of activity and amounts of activity in ensembles of nerve fibers and central neurons. The basis for this proposition is that the sensitivity functions or

Developmental specification of function: Cerebral cortex and its inputs

How is cortical function initially specified in brain development, and how does this relate to the problem of neural coding? During the early cell migration phase of development, the neocortex is not segregated into unique sensory and motor areas, but appears to consist of a functionally homogeneous or equipotential “protocortex” [86]. A “proto-map” of prospective cortical areas may be present in the germinal epithelium, so that the final tangential location of a cortical neuron is determined

Acknowledgements

I thank Douglas D. Rasmusson, Richard H. Ray, and S. David Stoney, Jr. for very helpful comments on this manuscript. I am especially grateful to Robert P. Erickson for many stimulating discussions over the years, for his continued support of my work, and for his enduring friendship.

References (124)

  • R.P. Erickson et al.

    Neuron and stimulus typologies in the rat gustatory system

    Brain Res

    (1980)
  • R.S.J. Frackowiak

    Functional mapping of verbal memory and language

    Trends Neurosci

    (1994)
  • J.M. Gibson et al.

    Diversity of coding profiles of mechanoreceptors in glabrous skin of kittens

    Brain Res

    (1975)
  • G.M. Innocenti

    Exuberant development of connections, and its possible permissive role in cortical evolution

    Trends Neurosci

    (1995)
  • H. Johansson et al.

    A method for analysis of encoding of stimulus separation in ensembles of afferents

    J Neurosci Methods

    (1995)
  • D.A. Marshall

    A comparative study of neural coding in gustation

    Physiol Behav

    (1968)
  • S.K. McConnell

    The determination of neuronal fate in the cerebral cortex

    Trends Neurosci

    (1989)
  • Z. Molnar et al.

    How do thalamic axons find their way to the cortex?

    Trends Neurosci

    (1995)
  • R.W. Morse et al.

    Population and modality characteristics of neurons in the coronal region of somatosensory area I of the cat

    Exp Neurol.

    (1965)
  • D.D.M. O'Leary

    Do cortical areas emerge from a protocortex?

    Trends Neurosci

    (1989)
  • L.M. Pubols et al.

    Orientation detectors in the primary somatosensory neocortex of the raccoon

    Brain Res

    (1977)
  • R.H. Ray et al.

    Coding of stimulus location and intensity in populations of mechanosensitive nerve fibers of the raccoonI. Single fiber response properties

    Brain Res Bull

    (1990)
  • R.H. Ray et al.

    Coding of stimulus location and intensity in populations of mechanosensitive nerve fibers of the raccoonII. Across-fiber response patterns

    Brain Res Bull

    (1990)
  • L.F. Abbott et al.

    Representational capacity of face coding in monkeys

    Cereb Cortex

    (1996)
  • E.D. Adrian et al.

    Sensory discharges in single cutaneous nerve fibers

    J Physiol

    (1931)
  • H.B. Barlow

    Single units and sensationsa neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology

    Perception

    (1972)
  • E. Bonda et al.

    Neural systems for tactual memories

    J Neurophysiol

    (1996)
  • H. Burton et al.

    Multiple foci in parietal and frontal cortex activated by rubbing embossed grating patterns across fingerpadsa positron emission tomography study in humans

    Cereb Cortex

    (1997)
  • P.S. Churchland et al.

    The Computational Brain

    (1992)
  • I. Darian–Smith

    The sense of touchperformance and peripheral neural processes

  • I. Darian–Smith et al.

    Peripheral neural representation of the spatial frequency of a grating moving at different velocities across the monkey's finger pad

    J Physiol

    (1980)
  • I. Darian–Smith et al.

    Peripheral neural representation of the two spatial dimensions of a textured surface moving across the monkey's finger pad

    J Physiol

    (1980)
  • S.A. Deadwyler et al.

    The significance of neural ensemble codes during behavior and cognition

    Annu Rev Neurosci

    (1997)
  • G.S. Doetsch

    Perceptual significance of somatosensory cortical reorganization following peripheral denervation

    Neuroreport

    (1998)
  • G.S. Doetsch et al.

    Synaptic processing of taste-quality information in the nucleus tractus solitarius of the rat

    J Neurophysiol

    (1970)
  • G.S. Doetsch et al.

    Information processing in the taste system of the rat

  • L.M. Eisenman

    Neural encoding of sound locationan electrophysiological study in auditory cortex (AI) of the cat using free field stimuli

    Brain Res

    (1974)
  • R.P. Erickson

    On the neural bases of behavior

    Am Sci

    (1984)
  • R.P. Erickson

    Parallel “population” neural coding in feature extraction

  • Erickson RP. Sensory neural patterns and gustation. In: Zotterman Y, editor. Proceedings of the First International...
  • R.P. Erickson

    Stimulus coding in topographic and non-topographic afferent modalitieson the significance of the activity of individual sensory neurons

    Psychol Rev

    (1968)
  • R.P. Erickson et al.

    The gustatory neural response function

    J Gen Physiol

    (1965)
  • R.P. Erickson et al.

    A fuzzy set approach to the organization of the gustatory system

    Prim Sensory Neuron

    (1995)
  • O.V. Favorov et al.

    Minicolumnar organization within somatosensory cortical segregatesI. Development of afferent connections

    Cereb Cortex

    (1994)
  • O.V. Favorov et al.

    Minicolumnar organization within somatosensory cortical segregatesII. Emergent functional properties

    Cereb Cortex

    (1994)
  • O.V. Favorov et al.

    Stimulus-response diversity in local neuronal populations of the cerebral cortex

    Neuroreport

    (1996)
  • D.J. Felleman et al.

    Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex

    Cereb Cortex

    (1991)
  • M. Frank

    The classification of mammalian afferent taste nerve fibers

    Chem Senses Flavor

    (1974)
  • M. Frey et al.

    Beiträge zur Physiologie des Schmerzsinns, III

    Ber kgl sächs Ges Wiss Math phys Kl

    (1895)
  • Cited by (45)

    • A Functional Topographic Map for Spinal Sensorimotor Reflexes

      2021, Neuron
      Citation Excerpt :

      Two divergent views have emerged: one based on the specificity theory of labeled-line transmission (Müller, 1840), the other on population coding (Melzack and Wall, 1965) that postulates the spatial and temporal coding of sensory inputs as being key in defining the behavioral output (Craig, 2003; Handwerker, 2014; Ma, 2010). Although the characterization of many peripheral afferent pathways is consistent with labeled-line transmission (Abraira and Ginty, 2013; Basbaum et al., 2009; Dong and Dong, 2018), other studies point to cross-talk within the spinal cord (Arcourt et al., 2017; Doetsch, 2000; Ma, 2010). However, efforts to deduce the logic of somatosensory coding in the spinal cord are complicated by the high degree of molecular heterogeneity within the dorsal horn (Del Barrio et al., 2013; Häring et al., 2018; Sathyamurthy et al., 2018; Zeisel et al., 2018) and the overlapping input that these molecularly diverse cell types receive, as exemplified by the multiple interneuron (IN) classes innervated by low-threshold mechanoreceptors (LTMRs) (Abraira et al., 2017).

    • Beyond labeled lines: A population coding account of the thermal grill illusion

      2020, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      This view offers a way to explain “illusions” not as exceptional circumstances under which the system is at fault, but as an expression of a fully functioning sensory system. Population coding has been previously hypothesized to explain perception of spatial and intensity properties of nociceptive stimulation (Quevedo and Coghill, 2009), as well as more generally within the somatosensory system (Doetsch, 2000; Ma, 2012, 2010). However, so far, very few empirical studies have addressed specific population coding mechanisms in the thermo-nociceptive system (Wang et al., 2018).

    • Rewards, perils and pitfalls of untangling spinal pain circuits

      2019, Current Opinion in Physiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The somatosensory system plays a fundamental role in our ability to perceive, and ultimately react to, our environment. While there is debate about how this sensory information from the periphery is encoded and conveyed to the brain for ultimate perception [1,2], it is well established that the spinal dorsal horn plays a key role in the gating, modulation and relay of nociceptive sensory input to brain higher centres [3,4•,5••]. The perception of acute ‘day-to-day’ pain is fundamental to our wellbeing, serving a protective role by raising our awareness to threatening environments and to actual tissue damage.

    • The neural circuits of thermal perception

      2018, Current Opinion in Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the perception of cold and warm co-varies in humans [10] and multi-modal (mostly touch and temperature) responses have been observed at the afferent [11,12,13,14•], thalamic [15–17], and cortical [14•,18] levels of the thermal system. These observations of functional and perceptual integration of somatosensory modalities has prompted models of sensory coding that combine specialized receptors pathways with temporal coding schemes [12,13,19,20]. Here we summarize the current knowledge about the neural circuits underlying thermal perception (see also [21•]) and examine recent functional studies in the mouse.

    • Acute anti-allodynic action of gabapentin in dorsal horn and primary somatosensory cortex: Correlation of behavioural and physiological data

      2017, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Neuronal traces that met these criteria were included in subsequent analysis. The index of excitability used for cortical excitability was the ‘neural mass’ or the fraction of responsive cells multiplied by the mean normalized response (Doetsch, 2000). This measure provided a more suitable parameter for comparing neuronal population coding and excitability of the PSC between different animals.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text