Complex-cell receptive field models

https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0082(88)90016-0Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (116)

  • D.A. Pollen et al.

    Spatial frequency selectivity of periodic complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat

    Vision Res.

    (1978)
  • D.A. Pollen et al.

    Use of Gabor elementary functions to probe receptive field substructure of posterior inferotemporal neurons in the owl monkey

    Vision Res.

    (1984)
  • D. Rose

    Mechanisms underlying the receptive field properties of neurons in cats visual cortex

    Vision Res.

    (1979)
  • S.M. Sherman et al.

    Further differences in receptive field properties of simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex

    Vision Res.

    (1976)
  • D.G. Albrecht et al.

    Are bars or gratings the optimal stimuli?

    Science

    (1980)
  • B.W. Andrews et al.

    Relationship between spatial frequency selectivity and receptive field profile of simple cells

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1979)
  • C.L. Baker et al.

    Spatial receptive field properties of direction-selective neurons in cat striate cortex

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1986)
  • C.L. Baker et al.

    Linear and non-linear components of human electroretinogram

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1984)
  • N. Berman et al.

    Functional organization of neurons in cat striate cortex: variations in ocular dominance and receptive field type with cortical lamina and location in visual field

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1982)
  • P.O. Bishop et al.

    Striate neurons: receptive field concepts

    Invest. Ophthalmol.

    (1972)
  • P.O. Bishop et al.

    Responses to visual contours: spatial-temporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurons

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1971)
  • P.O. Bishop et al.

    Receptive fields of simple cells in the cat striate cortex

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1973)
  • C. Blakemore et al.

    On the existence of neurons in the visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1969)
  • A.B. Bonds

    Spatial phase dependence of orientation-selective inhibition in cat striate cortex

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

    (1984)
  • A.B. Bonds

    The role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex

    Vis. Neurosci.

    (1988)
  • J. Bullier et al.

    Neural paths taken by afferent streams in striate cortex of the cat

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1979)
  • J. Bullier et al.

    Laminar distribution of first order neurons and afferent terminals in cat striate cortex

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1979)
  • J. Bullier et al.

    Receptive-field transformations between LGN neurons and S-cells of cat striate cortex

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1982)
  • F.W. Campbell et al.

    Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1968)
  • F.W. Campbell et al.

    Visibility of aperiodic patterns compared with that of sinusoidal gratings

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1969)
  • M.C. Citron et al.

    Spatial and temporal receptive-field analysis of the cat's geniculate pathway

    Vision Res.

    (1982)
  • M. Cynader et al.

    Recovery of function in cat visual cortex following prolonged deprivation

    Expl Brain Res.

    (1976)
  • A.F. Dean

    The relationship between response amplitude and contrast for cat striate cortical neurones

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1981)
  • A.F. Dean et al.

    On the distinctness of simple and complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1983)
  • R.L. De Valois et al.

    Spatial vision

    A. rev. Psychol.

    (1980)
  • K.K. De Valois et al.

    Responses of striate cortex cells to grating and checkerboard patterns

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1979)
  • C. Enroth-Cugell et al.

    The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1966)
  • D. Ferster

    Segregation of X and Y afferents into areas 17 and 18 of cat visual cortex

    Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.

    (1987)
  • B.L. Finlay et al.

    Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. IV. Corticotectal cells

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1976)
  • C.D. Gilbert

    Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1977)
  • C.D. Gilbert et al.

    Morphology and intracortical projections of functionally characterized neurons in the cat visual cortex

    Nature, Lond.

    (1979)
  • V.D. Glezer

    Spatial and spatial frequency characteristics of receptive fields of visual cortex and piecewise Fourier analysis

  • V.D. Glezer et al.

    Local spectral analysis in the visual cortex

    Biol. Cybernetics

    (1977)
  • V.D. Glezer et al.

    Linear and non-linear properties of simple and complex receptive fields in area 17 of the cat visual cortex

    Biol. Cybernetics

    (1980)
  • V.D. Glezer et al.

    Spatio-temporal organization of receptive fields of the cat striate cortex

    Biol. Cybernetics

    (1982)
  • A.W. Goodwin et al.

    Direction selectivity of complex cells in comparison with simple cells

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1975)
  • S. Grossberg et al.

    Neuronal dynamics of perceptual grouping: textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations

    Perception Psychophys.

    (1985)
  • P. Hammond et al.

    Differential responses of cat visual cortical cells to textured stimuli

    Expl Brain Res.

    (1976)
  • P. Hammond et al.

    Differential responsiveness of simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex to visual texture

    Expl Brain Res.

    (1977)
  • P. Hammond et al.

    On the sensitivity of complex cells in feline striate cortex to relative motion

    Expl Brain Res.

    (1982)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Computational framework of the visual sensory system based on neuroscientific evidence of the ventral pathway

      2023, Cognitive Systems Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another function attributed to the primary visual cortex (V1) is the enhancement of the spatial invariance of the edges detected by the simple cells; biologically this process is performed by the complex cells. The mathematical model used to mimic the behavior of complex cells is called the Gabor energy model, used and accepted in various works to represent the receptive field of complex cells (Adelson & Bergen, 1985; Field, 1987; Mallot, 2013; Pollen et al., 1988; Shams & von der Malsburg, 2002; Spitzer & Hochstein, 1988). The advantage of using complex cells in this model is the reduction of edge information with specific orientations, especially if the image generates a great deal of edge information in the simple V1 cells.

    • Automatic mapping of visual cortex receptive fields: A fast and precise algorithm

      2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ringach (2004) presented a description of nine methods that have been developed over the years to map receptive fields. In this review, Ringach (2004) presented fundamental and new theoretical concepts that accompany the following methods: (1) the linear-non-linear model and reverse correlation method (Rodieck and Stone, 1965a,b); (2) Gabor-like shapes and simple receptive fields (Movshon et al., 1978; Ringach, 2002); (3) non-linear outputs and their measurement (Chichilnisky, 2001); (4) spatio–temporal properties and direction selectivity (Adelson and Bergen, 1985; Reid et al., 1987; DeAngelis et al., 1995); (5) the gain control model (Albrecht and Geisler, 1991; Geisler and Albrecht, 1991; Robson, 1991; Heeger, 1992); (6) gain control and intracortical sharpening of tuning (DeAngelis et al., 1992); (7) the energy model and complex cells (Spitzer and Hochstein, 1985, 1988; Adelson and Bergen, 1985); (8) non-Gaussian models for estimating RF structures (De Ruyter van Steveninck and Bialek, 1988; Chechik et al., 2004); and (9) the hierarchical model and theories of cortical function (Maffei and Fiorentini, 1973; De Valois et al., 1979; Kulikowski and Bishop, 1981; Bell and Sejnowski, 1997; Simoncelli and Olshausen, 2001; Hurri and Hyvarinen, 2003). If one accepts the view that receptive field properties appear to lie on a continuum, it is sensible to seek theoretical models that explain the distribution of receptive field properties and their correlations across the entire population.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text