Elsevier

Behavioural Brain Research

Volume 65, Issue 1, 16 November 1994, Pages 89-101
Behavioural Brain Research

Lack of effect of lesions in the anterior cingulate cortex and retrosplenial cortex on certain tests of spatial memory in the rat

https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(94)90077-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The effects of cytotoxic lesions in either the anterior cingulate cortex or the retrosplenial cortex were compared with those of fornix lesions on three tests of spatial memory. Two of the tasks, delayed nonmatching-to-position and spatial reversal learning, were tested in an automated apparatus. The third task, forced alternation, was tested in a T-maze. Neither anterior cingulate nor retrosplenial cortex damage produced any significant impairment on the three tasks. In contrast, rats with fornix lesions (hippocampal system damage) were markedly impaired on all three tasks. The results, which were considered in the light of proposals for a hippocampal—anterior thalamic—cingulate system that is important for spatial memory, suggest that neither of the cingulate regions involved in this study form a critical subcomponent of this proposed system. It is therefore assumed that the cingulate cortices are only critical for certain classes of spatial problem. It is also suggested that in some previous studies the effects of inadvertent damage to the cingulum bundle may have contributed to the apparent effects of cingulate lesions.

References (45)

  • B. Kolb

    Functions of the frontal cortex of the rat: a comparative review

    Brain Res. Rev.

    (1984)
  • B. Kolb et al.

    Dissociation of the contributions of the prefrontal cortex and dorsomedial thalamic nucleus to spatially guided behavior in the rat

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1982)
  • K. Matsunami et al.

    Mode of [14C]2-deoxy-d-glucose uptake into retrosplenial cortex and other memory-related structures of the monkey during a delayed response

    Brain Res. Bull.

    (1989)
  • M. Meunier et al.

    Electrolytic but not ibotenic acid lesions of the posterior cingulate cortex produce transitory facilitation of learning in mice

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1988)
  • N. Neave et al.

    Lack of effect of dorsomedial thalamic lesions on automated tests of spatial memory in the rat

    Behav. Brain. Res.

    (1993)
  • A. Sahgal

    Vasopressin retards the acquisition of positively reinforced lever pressing in homozygous Brattleboro rats

    Regul. Pept.

    (1983)
  • R.J. Sutherland et al.

    The role of the fornix/fimbria and some related subcortical structures in place learning and memory

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1989)
  • G. Winocur

    The hippocampus and thalamus: their roles in short- and long-term memory and the effects of interference

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1985)
  • G.N.O. Brito et al.

    Prelimbic cortex, mediodorsal thalamus, septum, and delayed alternation in rats

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1982)
  • S.B. Dunnett

    Comparative effects of cholinergic drugs and lesions of nucleus basalis or fimbria-fornix on delayed matching in rats

    Psychopharmacology

    (1985)
  • S.B. Dunnett

    Role of prefrontal cortex and striatal output systems in short-term memory deficits associated with ageing, basal forebrain lesions, and cholinergic rich grafts

    Can. J. Psychol.

    (1990)
  • S.B. Dunnett et al.

    Proactive interference effects on short-term memory in rats: II. Effects in young and aged rats

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (92)

    • Examining a role for the retrosplenial cortex in age-related memory impairment

      2022, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
      Citation Excerpt :

      This includes learning about the spatial environment (Miller et al., 2019; 2021), associating complex contextual stimuli with an unconditional stimulus (Kwapis et al., 2015; Sigwald et al., 2016), working memory (Keene & Bucci, 2009; Pothuizen et al., 2010), and situations in which neutral cues become associated either before (Fournier et al., 2020; Robinson et al., 2014) or following (Todd et al., 2016) conditioning (see Fournier et al., 2021b, for a review). A recent series of papers have begun to investigate how distinct regions along the rostro-caudal axis of the RSC contribute to memory formation and retention based on findings that suggest spatial learning is disrupted when a more posterior region of the RSC is damaged (Vann et al., 2003) but similar lesions in the anterior RSC leave spatial learning intact (Neave et al., 1994). Further work found that the anterior region was needed for object memory (de Landeta et al., 2020), suggesting dissociable roles for regions of the RSC.

    • Optogenetic inhibition of either the anterior or posterior retrosplenial cortex disrupts retrieval of a trace, but not delay, fear memory

      2021, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
      Citation Excerpt :

      Simpler forms of conditioning in which a CS coterminates with a UCS (i.e., delay fear conditioning) do not rely on the RSC for memory formation (Kwapis, et al., 2014; 2017). Previous work shows that spatial learning relies preferentially on the posterior, but not anterior, portion of the RSC (Neave, et al., 1994; Vann & Aggleton, 2004; Vann, et al., 2003). Conversely, the anterior region seems to be especially important for object memory (de Landeta, et al., 2020).

    • Deep brain stimulation and cognition: Translational aspects

      2020, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text