Human sensitivity to expanding and rotating motion: effects of complementary masking and directional structure
Reference (36)
On the information in optical flows
Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing
(1983)- et al.
Illusory motion in depth: Aftereffect of adaptation to changing size
Vision Research
(1978) - et al.
Looming detectors in the human visual pathway
Vision Research
(1978) - et al.
Neurons in area 18 of cat striate cortex selectively sensitive to changing size: Nonlinear interactions between responses to two edges
Vision Research
(1979) - et al.
Neural mechanisms of space vision in the parietal association cortex of the monkey
Vision Research
(1985) Motion and texture as sources of slant information
Journal of Experimental Psychology
(1968)- et al.
Shape and depth perception from parallel-projections of three-dimensional motion
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
(1984) - et al.
The observer-relative velocity field as the basis for effective motion parallax
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
(1988) - et al.
Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque
Journal of Neurophysyiology
(1981) - et al.
Motion aftereffect: A global mechanism for the perception of rotation
Perception
(1980)
Perception of surface slant and edge labels for optical flow: A computational approach
Perception
Perception with an eye to motion
The importance of velocity gradients in the perception of three-dimensional rigidity
Perception
Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction
Science
The perception of the visual world
The ecological approach to visual perception
The analysis and possible usage of expanding and rotating retinal flow
Phantom spiral aftereffect: Evidence for global mechanisms in perception
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
Cited by (98)
Temporal characteristics of global form perception in translational and circular Glass patterns
2021, Vision ResearchCitation Excerpt :Participants showed a similar SPN for circular and radial static GPs with respect to translational GPs that were, in turn, the most difficult to detect. Interestingly, other studies found similar results with directional motion (Freeman & Harris, 1992; Lee & Lu, 2010). In particular, Lee and Lu (2010) compared participants’ coherence thresholds for circular, radial, and translational motion.
Infants’ perceptions of constraints on object motion as a function of object shape
2017, CognitionCitation Excerpt :What is relatively new with regards to this finding vis a vis complexity is the explicit relation between perceived complexity (as indicated by preferential fixation) and the amount of observable motion information. Interestingly, research on motion perception suggests that global motion information is generally decomposable into dimensions of translational, circular, and radial motion (Burr, Badcock, & Ross, 2001; Lee & Lu, 2010), with researchers debating whether the processing of such information is comparable across motions (Aaen-Stockdale, Ledgeway, & Hess, 2007; Blake & Aiba, 1998) or varies with the form of the motion (Edwards & Badcock, 1996; Freeman & Harris, 1992; Lee & Lu, 2010). Accordingly, further investigation of the relation between perceived complexity/preference and the amount and type of motion information in infants would seem to be a fruitful avenue for future research.
Development of radial optic flow pattern sensitivity at different speeds
2015, Vision ResearchIncrement thresholds for radial frequency trajectories produce a dipper function
2012, Vision ResearchCitation Excerpt :Similarly, observers are able to discriminate rigid from non-rigid motion based upon periodic deformations of a rotating object (Hogervorst, Kappers, & Koenderink, 1997; also see Braunstein, Hoffman, & Pollick, 1990; Domini, Caudek, & Proffitt, 1997; Todd & Norman, 1991). Second, they fit well with what we already know about the visual system’s exquisite sensitivity to radial and circular patterns of form and motion (Beardsley & Vaina, 2005; Freeman & Harris, 1992; Loffler & Wilson, 2001; Morrone, Burr, & Vaina, 1995; Wilkinson, Wilson, & Habak, 1998). Third, they are amenable to a high degree of parametric control, allowing a broad and systematic testing of the visual system’s response to this class of pattern.
Motion psychophysics: 1985-2010
2011, Vision Research