Physiological motor asymmetry in human handedness: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation
References (53)
- et al.
Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1989) Persisting apraxia in two left-handed, aphasic patients with right-hemisphere lesions
Brain Cogn.
(1987)- et al.
Topographic mapping of the human motor cortex with magnetic stimulation: factors affecting accuracy and reproducibility
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1992) - et al.
Patterns of hand preference in a student population
Cortex
(1975) - et al.
Handedness is not a unidimensional trait
Cortex
(1986) - et al.
Coil placement in magnetic brain stimulation related to skull and brain anatomy
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1991) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Neuropsychologia
(1971)- et al.
Increased cortical excitability in generalised epilepsy demonstrated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
Lancet
(1992) - et al.
The interpretationof electromyographic responses to electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in diseases of the upper motor neurone
The interpretation of electromyographic responses to electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in diseases of the upper motor neurone
J. Neurol. Sci.
(1987) - et al.
Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1992)
Neuroanatomical asymmetry in left-handers
Physiological basis of motor effects of a transient stimulus to cerebral cortex
Neurosurgery
The binomial distribution of right, mixed and left handedness
Q.J. Exp. Psychol.
Handedness: proficiency versus stated preference
Percept. Mot. Skills
Postexercise depression of motor evoked potentials: a measure of central nervous system fatigue
Exp. Brain Res.
Magnetic stimulation: determination of coil current flow direction
Neurology
Task-dependent changes in the size of the response to magnetic brain stimulation in human first dorsal interosseous muscle
J. Physiol.
The pyramidal tract
Neurology
Direction of current in magnetic stimulation coils used for percutaneous activation of brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerve
J. Physiol.
Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses
J. Physiol.
Changes in the response to magnetic and electrical stimulation of the motor cortex following muscle stretch in man
J. Physiol.
Handedness in neuropsychological research
Cerebral lateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research
Arch. Neurol.
Apraxia and agraphia in a left-hander
Brain
Apraxia
Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain
J. Physiol.
Cited by (151)
Noninvasive electrical and magnetic brain stimulation (with insights on the effects of cellular phones emissions): Basic principles and procedures for clinical application
2021, Magnetic Materials and Technologies for Medical ApplicationsThe causal role of the left parietal lobe in facilitation and inhibition of return
2019, CortexCitation Excerpt :The session began by first determining the hotspot for the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) – defined as the optimum site over primary motor cortex (M1) which evoked the highest contralateral motor evoked potentials (MEP) in the relaxed FDI. Then, we determined the resting motor threshold (rMT), defined as the minimum stimulus intensity which elicits MEPs > 50 μV in five out of ten consecutive trials (Chen, Yung, & Li, 2003; Rossini et al., 2015; Triggs, Calvanio, Macdonell, Cros, & Chiappa, 1994). Electromyography (EMG) and MEPs were recorded from the right FDI by using snap surface electrodes (Natus Neurology).
Multiple-command single-frequency SSVEP-based BCI system using flickering action video
2019, Journal of Neuroscience MethodsTemporal Profile and Limb-specificity of Phasic Pain-Evoked Changes in Motor Excitability
2018, NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :In this analysis, a main effect of ‘perception’, or an interaction between the factors ‘perception’ and the factors ‘ISI cluster’ or ‘side’ would indicate that nociceptive stimuli perceived as more or less intense do not exert the same effect on motor excitability. A baseline recording of MEPs was performed at the beginning and at the end of the experiment (20 TMS pulses delivered using a constant 6–7 s inter-trial interval), to assess potential inter-block cumulative effects of the repeated TMS pulses (Pellicciari et al., 2016) and/or differences related to hand dominance (Triggs et al., 1994). The average amplitude of the MEPs obtained at the two baseline measurements were compared using a two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with the factors ‘time’ (beginning vs. end of the experiment) and ‘dominance’ (MEPs recorded from the dominant vs. non-dominant limb).