The connections of presubiculum and parasubiculum in the rat

doi:10.1016/0006-8993(90)90976-I

Brain Research

Volume 518, Issues 1–2, 4 June 1990, Pages 227-243

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)90976-I Get rights and content

Abstract

The present study describes the differences and similarities between the connections of the presubiculum and parasubiculum based on retrograde and anterograde tracing experiments. The results demonstrate that both areas have several similar afferent connections, particularly those from subcortical areas such as the claustrum, diagonal band of Broca, anterior thalamus, nucleus reuniens, locus coeruleus, and raphe nuclei. Both subicular areas also are innervated by axons originating in the ipsilateral and contralateral entorhinal cortex, presubiculum, and parasubiculum. In contrast to these similarities, most axons innervating the presubiculum originate in the lateral dorsal thalamic nucleus, the claustrum, and the contralateral presubiculum. Conversely, the parasubiculum is innervated primarily by axons that originate in area CA₁ of the hippocampus, the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala, and the contralateral presubiculum and parasubiculum. The major efferent projection from the presubiculum and parasubiculum courses bilaterally to the medial entorhinal cortex; however, the results of the present study confirm previous suggestions that presubicular axons terminate almost exclusively in layers I and III, whereas parasubicular axons innervate layer II. The presubiculum also projects to the anteroventral and laterodorsal nuclei of the thalamus, and the lateral ventral portion of the medial mammillary nucleus, whereas the parasubiculum projects prominently to the anterodorsal nucleus of the thalamus, the contralateral presubiculum and parasubiculum, and the lateral dorsal segment of the medial mammillary nucleus. Thus despite some similarities, the major connections of presubiculum and parasubiculum are distinct from one another and distinct from the projections of the adjacent subiculum and postsubiculum. These results suggest that the subicular cortex is considerably more complex than previously envisioned and indicate that each segment may subserve a distinct role in the processing of information by the hippocampal formation.

Reference (63)

BecksteadR.M.
Afferent connections of the entorhinal area in the rat as demonstrated by retrograde cell-labeling with horseradish peroxidase
Brain Research
(1978)
CowanW.M. et al.
The autoradiographic demonstration of axonal connections in the central nervous system
Brain Research
(1972)
DonovanM.K. et al.
Evidence for some collateralization between cortical and diencephalic efferent axons of the rat subicular cortex
Brain Research
(1983)
FinchD.M. et al.
Neurophysiology of the caudally directed hippocampal efferent system in the rat: projections to the subicular complex
Brain Research
(1980)
FinchD.M. et al.
Demonstration of caudally directed hippocampal efferents in the rat by intrcellular injection of horseradish peroxidase
Brain Research
(1981)
FinchD.M. et al.
Afferent fibers to rat cingulate cortex
Exp. Neurol.
(1984)
GerfenC.R. et al.
An anterograde neuroanatomical tracing method that shows the detailed morphology of neurons, their axons and terminals: immunohistochemical l localization of an axonally transported plant lectin,Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L)
Brain Research
(1984)
GroenewegenH.J. et al.
Cortical afferents of the nucleus accumbens in the cat, studied with anterograde and retrograde transport techniques
Neuroscience
(1982)
GroenewegenH.J. et al.
Organization of the projections from the subiculum to the ventral striatum in the rat. A study using anterograde transport ofPhaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin
Neuroscience
(1987)
KöhlerC.
Morphological details of the projection from the presubiculum to the entorhinal area as shown by the novel PHA-L immunohistochemical tracing method in the rat
Neurosci. Lett.
(1984)

KöhlerC. et al.

Some retrohippocampal afferents to the entorhinal cortex: cells of origin as studied by HRP method in the rat and mouse

Neurosci. Lett.

(1978)

MeibachR.C. et al.

Subicular projections to the posterior cingulate cortex in rats

Exp. Neurol.

(1977)

MeibachR.C. et al.

Efferent connections of the hippocampal formation in the rat

Brain Research

(1977)

MeibachR.C. et al.

Thalamic projections of the hippocampal formation: evidence for an alternate pathway involving the internal capsula

Brain Research

(1977)

SchwartzS.P. et al.

Neurons of origin of the perforant path

Exp. Neurol.

(1981)

SegalM.

Afferents to the entorhinal cortex of the rat studied by the method of retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase

Exp. Neurol.

(1977)

SegalM.

A potent inhibitory monosynaptic hypothalamohippocampal connection

Brain Research

(1979)

SegalM. et al.

Afferents to the hippocampus of the rat studied with the method of retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase

Brain Research

(1974)

ShipleyM.T.

Presubiculum afferents to the entorhinal area and the Paper-circuit

Brain Research

(1974)

ShipleyM.T. et al.

On the laminar organization of the anterior thalamus projections to the presubiculum in the guinea pig

Brain Research

(1975)

SikesR.W. et al.

The origin of the direct hippocampo-anterior thalamic bundle in the rat: a combined horseradish peroxidase-Golgi analysis

Exp. Neurol.

(1977)

SripanidkulchaiK. et al.

Two rapid methods of counterstaining fluorescent dye tracers containing sections without reducing flurescence

Brain Research

(1986)

Van HoesenG.W. et al.

Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. I. Temporal lobe afferents

Brain Research

(1975)

VogtB.

A reduced silver stain for normal axons in the central nervous system

Physiol. Behav.

(1974)

WyssJ.M. et al.

A study of subcortical afferents to the hippocampal formation in the rat

Neuroscience

(1979)

AmaralD.G. et al.

The commissural connections of the monkey hippocampal formation

J. Comp. Neurol.

(1984)

AndersenP. et al.

Organization of the hippocampal output

Brain Research

(1973)

BlackstadT.W.

Commissural connections of the hippocampal region in the rat, with special reference to their mode of termination

J. Comp. Neurol.

(1956)

BrodmannK.

Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien Dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues

(1909)

EdingerH.M. et al.

The subicular cortex of the cat: an anatomical and electrophysiological study

Exp. Neurol.

(1974)

GeneserF.A.

Distribution of acetylcholinesterase in the hippocampal region of the rabbit. I. Entorhinal area, parasubiculum, and presubiculum

J. Comp. Neurol.

(1986)

Cited by (227)

Convergence of location, direction, and theta in the rat anteroventral thalamic nucleus
2023, iScience
The thalamus and cortex are anatomically interconnected, with the thalamus providing integral information for cortical functions. The anteroventral thalamic nucleus (AV) is reciprocally connected to retrosplenial cortex (RSC). Two distinct AV subfields, dorsomedial (AVDM) and ventrolateral (AVVL), project differentially to granular vs. dysgranular RSC, respectively. To probe if functional responses of AV neurons differ, we recorded single neurons and local field potentials from AVDM and AVVL in rats during foraging. We observed place cells (neurons modulated by spatial location) in both AVDM and AVVL. Additionally, we characterized neurons modulated by theta oscillations, heading direction, and a conjunction of these. Place cells and conjunctive Theta-by-Head direction cells were more prevalent in AVVL; more non-conjunctive theta and directional neurons were prevalent in AVDM. These findings add further evidence that there are two thalamocortical circuits connecting AV and RSC, and reveal that the signaling involves place information in addition to direction and theta.
Mapping the neural circuits responding to deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus in the rat brain
2022, Epilepsy Research
Clinical studies have demonstrated that deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is a safe and effective treatment for focal epilepsy and drug-resistant epilepsy. However, the mechanism of action of ANT deep brain stimulation, especially in terms of neuromodulatory circuits, is not fully understood. In this study, we evaluated the anatomical and functional connectivity of the ANT in rats. For anatomical connectivity, herpes simplex virus (HSV) and pseudorabies virus (PRV; Bartha stain) were focally injected into the ANT of rats to label the connected brain structures in the retrograde and anterograde directions, respectively. For functional connectivity, we used c-Fos mapping in conjunction with electrical stimulation of the ANT to map the brain structures functionally connected to the ANT. Circuit connectivity mapping revealed that the ANT was connected to the hippocampus, the nucleus accumbens, the dorsal part of the lateral septal nucleus (LSD), the amygdala, the secondary motor cortex (M2), the cingulate cortex, the substantia nigra, the hypothalamus, and other regions. The ipsilateral connections were stronger than the contralateral connections. Deep brain stimulation of the ANT resulted in c-fos expression in the cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, striatum and hypothalamus, with the strongest activation in the hippocampus. These results suggest that the ANT has a wide range of structural and functional connections, which may underlie the effectiveness of deep brain stimulation in treating epilepsy.
The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
Medial entorhinal cortex commissural input regulates the activity of spatially and object-tuned cells contributing to episodic memory
2022, Neuron
Citation Excerpt :
Regions of great interest were the medial septum, the “pacemaker” of theta rhythmic activity in the MEC (Jeffery et al., 1995; Mitchell et al., 1982); the anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN) because they harbor HD cells (Taube, 1995); and of course the hippocampus because it comprises place cells (O’Keefe and Dostrovsky, 1971). All three regions provide projections that target the superficial layers of the MEC directly (medial septum; Alonso and Köhler, 1984) or indirectly either via layer 5 of the MEC (CA1; Ohara et al., 2018) or via presubiculum (ATN; van Groen and Wyss, 1990; Peyrache et al., 2015). Indeed, inactivation of these brain areas added to our knowledge as to how the activity of spatially tuned cells in the MEC is modulated by these three functionally important inputs (Brandon et al., 2011; Koenig et al., 2011; Winter et al., 2015; Bonnevie et al., 2013).
Extensive interhemispheric projections connect many homotopic brain regions, including the hippocampal formation, but little is known as to how information transfer affects the functions supported by the target area. Here, we studied whether the commissural projections connecting the medial entorhinal cortices contribute to spatial coding, object coding, and memory. We demonstrate that input from the contralateral medial entorhinal cortex targets all major cell types in the superficial medial entorhinal cortex, modulating their firing rate. Notably, a fraction of responsive cells displayed object tuning and exhibited a reduction in their firing rate upon the inhibition of commissural input. In line with this finding are behavioral results that revealed the contribution of commissural input to episodic-like memory retrieval.
Time to retire the serial Papez circuit: Implications for space, memory, and attention
2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
After more than 80 years, Papez serial circuit remains a hugely influential concept, initially for emotion, but in more recent decades, for memory. Here, we show how this circuit is anatomically and mechanistically naïve as well as outdated. We argue that a new conceptualisation is necessitated by recent anatomical and functional findings that emphasize the more equal, working partnerships between the anterior thalamic nuclei and the hippocampal formation, along with their neocortical interactions in supporting, episodic memory. Furthermore, despite the importance of the anterior thalamic for mnemonic processing, there is growing evidence that these nuclei support multiple aspects of cognition, only some of which are directly associated with hippocampal function. By viewing the anterior thalamic nuclei as a multifunctional hub, a clearer picture emerges of extra-hippocampal regions supporting memory. The reformulation presented here underlines the need to retire Papez serially processing circuit.
The separate and combined properties of the granular (area 29) and dysgranular (area 30) retrosplenial cortex
2021, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Citation Excerpt :
Further area 29 and 30 connectivity differences extend to their respective thalamic links (Fig. 3). While area 29 in the rat brain is more closely connected with the anterodorsal and anteroventral nuclei, area 30 is more closely connected with the anteromedial thalamic nucleus (Sripanidkulchai & Wyss, 1986; Van Groen & Wyss, 1990, 1992a,b, 2003; Lomi et al., 2021). These same studies show that the lateral dorsal thalamic nucleus is interconnected with both areas 30 and 29, but preferentially projects to area 30.
Retrosplenial cortex contains two principal subdivisions, area 29 (granular) and area 30 (dysgranular). Their respective anatomical connections in the rat brain reveal that area 29 is the primary recipient of hippocampal and parahippocampal spatial and contextual information while area 30 is the primary interactor with current visual information. Lesion studies and measures of neuronal activity in rodents indicate that retrosplenial cortex helps to integrate space from different perspectives, e.g., egocentric and allocentric, providing landmark and heading cues for navigation and spatial learning. It provides a repository of scene information that, over time, becomes increasingly independent of the hippocampus. These processes, reflect the interactive actions between areas 29 and 30, along with their convergent influences on cortical and thalamic targets. Consequently, despite their differences, both areas 29 and 30 are necessary for an array of spatial and learning problems.
Thalamocortical interactions in cognition and disease: The mediodorsal and anterior thalamic nuclei
2021, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
The mediodorsal thalamus (MD) and anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN) are two adjacent brain nodes that support our ability to make decisions, learn, update information, form and retrieve memories, and find our way around. The MD and PFC work in partnerships to support cognitive processes linked to successful learning and decision-making, while the ATN and extended hippocampal system together coordinate the encoding and retrieval of memories and successful spatial navigation. Yet, while these distinctions may appear to be segregated, both the MD and ATN together support our higher cognitive functions as they regulate and are influenced by interconnected fronto-temporal neural networks and subcortical inputs. Our review focuses on recent studies in animal models and in humans. This evidence is re-shaping our understanding of the importance of MD and ATN cortico-thalamocortical pathways in influencing complex cognitive functions. Given the evidence from clinical settings and neuroscience research labs, the MD and ATN should be considered targets for effective treatments in neuropsychiatric diseases and disorders and neurodegeneration.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text