Skip to main content
Log in

Aural Acoustic Stapedius-Muscle Reflex Threshold Procedures to Test Human Infants and Adults

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Power-based procedures are described to measure acoustic stapedius-muscle reflex threshold and supra-threshold responses in human adult and infant ears at frequencies from 0.2 to 8 kHz. The stimulus set included five clicks in which four pulsed activators were placed between each pair of clicks, with each stimulus set separated from the next by 0.79 s to allow for reflex decay. Each click response was used to detect the presence of reflex effects across frequency that were elicited by a pulsed broadband-noise or tonal activator in the ipsilateral or contralateral test ear. Acoustic reflex shifts were quantified in terms of the difference in absorbed sound power between the initial baseline click and the later four clicks in each set. Acoustic reflex shifts were measured over a 40-dB range of pulsed activators, and the acoustic reflex threshold was objectively calculated using a maximum 10 likelihood procedure. To illustrate the principles underlying these new reflex tests, reflex shifts in absorbed sound power and absorbance are presented for data acquired in an adult ear with normal hearing and in two infant ears in the initial and follow-up newborn hearing screening exams, one with normal hearing and the other with a conductive hearing loss. The use of absorbed sound power was helpful in classifying an acoustic reflex shift as present or absent. The resulting reflex tests are in use in a large study of wideband clinical diagnosis and monitoring of middle-ear and cochlear function in infant and adult ears.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

FIG. 1
FIG. 2
FIG. 3
FIG. 4
FIG. 5
FIG. 6
FIG. 7
FIG. 8
FIG. 9
FIG. 10
FIG. 11
FIG. 12
FIG. 13
FIG. 14
FIG. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backus BC, Guinan JJ Jr (2006) Time-course of the human medial olivocochlear reflex. J Acoust Soc Am 119:2889–2904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MJ, Weatherby LA (1982) Newborn acoustic reflexes to noise and pure-tone signals. J Speech Hear Res 25:383–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Morlet T, St John P, Montgomery E, Thibodaux M (2005) Absent or elevated middle ear muscle reflexes in the presence of normal otoacoustic emissions: a universal finding in 136 cases of auditory neuropathy/dis synchrony. J Am Acad Audiol 16:546–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsayed AM, Hunter LL, Keefe DH, Feeney MP, Brown DK, Meinzen-Derr JK, Baroch K, Sullivan-Mahoney M, Francis K, Schaid LG (2015) Air and bone conduction click and tone-burst auditory brainstem thresholds using Kalman adaptive processing in non-sedated normal-hearing newborns. Ear Hear 36:471–481

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney MP, Keefe DH (1999) Acoustic reflex detection using wide-band acoustic reflectance, admittance, and power measurements. J Speech, Language, Hear Res 42:1029–1041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney MP, Keefe DH (2001) Estimating the acoustic reflex threshold from wideband measures of reflectance, admittance, and power. Ear Hear 22:316–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney MP, Sanford CA (2005) Detection of the acoustic stapedius reflex in infants using wideband energy reflectance and admittance. J Am Acad Audiol 16:278–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney MP, Keefe DH, Marryott LP (2003) Contralateral acoustic reflex threshold for tonal activators using wideband reflectance and admittance. J Speech, Language, Hear Res 46:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney MP, Keefe DH, Sanford CA (2004) Wideband reflectance measures of the ipsilateral acoustic stapedius reflex threshold. Ear Hear 25:421–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney MP, Keefe DH, Hunter LL, Fitzpatrick DF, Garinis AC, Putterman DB, McMillan GP (2016) Normative wide-band reflectance, equivalent admittance at the tympanic membrane, and acoustic stapedius reflex threshold in adults. In press

  • Geddes NK (1987) Tympanometry and the stapedial reflex in the first five days of life. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 13:293–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand SA, Schwander T, Silman S (1990) Acoustic reflex thresholds in normal and cochlear-impaired ears: effects of no-response rates on 90th percentiles in a large sample. J Speech Hear Disord 55:198–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman SS, Fitzpatrick DF, Ellison JC, Jesteadt W, Keefe DH (2009) High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 125:1014–1032

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Green DM (1993) A maximum-likelihood method for estimating threshold in a yes-no task. J Acoust Soc Am 93:2096–2105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gu X, Green DM (1994) Further studies of a maximum-likelihood yes-no procedure. J Acoust Soc Am 96:93–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch JE, Margolis RH, Rykken JR (1992) A comparison of acoustic reflex and auditory brain stem response screening of high-risk infants. Ear Hear 13:181–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoaglin D, Mosteller F, Tukey JW (1983) Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis. Wiley, New York, pp 1–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter L, Ries DT, Schlauch RS, Levine SC, Ward WD (1999) Safety and clinical performance of acoustic reflex tests. Ear Hear 20:506–514

  • Hunter LL, Keefe DH, Feeney MP, Fitzpatrick DF (2016) Pressurized wideband acoustic stapedial reflex thresholds: normal development and relationships to auditory function in infants. In Press, J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. doi:10.1007/s10162-016-0595-3

  • Keefe DH, Fitzpatrick DF, Liu Y, Sanford CA, Gorga MP (2010) Wideband acoustic-reflex test in a test battery to predict middle-ear dysfunction. Hear Res 263:52–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe DH, Hunter LL, Feeney MP, Fitzpatrick DF (2015) Procedures for ambient-pressure and tympanometric tests of aural acoustic reflectance and admittance in human infants and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 138:3625–3653

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kei J (2012) Acoustic spatial reflexes in healthy neonates-normative data and test-retest reliability. J Am Acad Audiol 23:46–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis RH (1993) Detection of hearing impairment with the acoustic stapedius reflex. Ear Hear 14:3–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis RH, Levine SC (1991) Acoustic reflex measures in audiologic evaluation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 24:329–347

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazlan R, Kei J, Hickson L (2009) Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates. Ear Hear 30:295–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Wehlau M, Mauermann M, Dau T, Kollmeier B (2005) The effects of neural synchronization and peripheral compression on the acoustic-reflex threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 117:3016–3027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann J, Uppenkamp S, Kollmeier B (1996) Detection of the acoustic reflex below 80 dB HL. Audiol Neurootol 1:359–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pang XD, Peake WT (1985) How do contractions of the stapedius muscle alter the acoustic properties of the ear? In: Allen J, Hall J, Hubbard A, Neely S, Tubis A (eds) Peripheral auditory mechanisms. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Popelka GR (1981) The acoustic reflex in normal and pathologic ears. In: Popelka GR (ed) Hearing assessment with the acoustic reflex. Grune & Stratton, New York, pp 5–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes MC, Margolis RH, Hirsch JE, Napp AP (1999) Hearing screening in the newborn intensive care nursery: comparison of methods. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 120:799–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague BH, Wiley TL, Goldstein R (1985) Tympanometric and acoustic-reflex studies in neonates. J Speech Hear Res 28:265–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherby LA, Bennett MJ (1980) The neonatal acoustic reflex. Scand Audiol 9:103–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Widen JE, Folsom RC, Cone-Wesson B, Carty L, Dunnell JJ, Koebsell K, Levi A, Mancl L, Ohlrich B, Trouba S, Gorga MP, Sininger YS, Vohr BR, Norton SJ (2000) Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: hearing status at 8 to 12 months corrected age using a visual reinforcement audiometry protocol. Ear Hear 21:471–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by R01 grant DC010202 and P30 grant DC004662 awarded from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Veterans Affairs. Douglas Keefe has an interest in the commercial development of devices to assess middle-ear function.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas H. Keefe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keefe, D.H., Feeney, M.P., Hunter, L.L. et al. Aural Acoustic Stapedius-Muscle Reflex Threshold Procedures to Test Human Infants and Adults. JARO 18, 65–88 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-016-0599-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-016-0599-z

Keywords

Navigation