Skip to main content
Log in

Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

The way an individual responds to cues associated with rewards may be a key determinant of vulnerability to compulsive behavioral disorders.

Objectives

We studied individual differences in Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior and examined the expression of neurobiological markers associated with the dopaminergic system, the same neural system implicated in incentive motivational processes.

Methods

Pavlovian autoshaping procedures consisted of the brief presentation of an illuminated retractable lever (conditioned stimulus) followed by the response-independent delivery of a food pellet (unconditioned stimulus), which lead to a Pavlovian conditioned response. In situ hybridization was performed on brains obtained either following the first or last (fifth) day of training.

Results

Two phenotypes emerged. Sign-trackers (ST) exhibited behavior that seemed to be largely controlled by the cue that signaled impending reward delivery; whereas goal-trackers (GT) preferentially approached the location where the reward was delivered. Following a single training session, ST showed greater expression of dopamine D1 receptor mRNA relative to GT. After 5 days of training, GT exhibited greater expression levels of tyrosine hydroxylase, dopamine transporter, and dopamine D2 receptor mRNA relative to ST.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the development of approach behavior towards signals vs goal leads to distinct adaptations in the dopamine system. The sign-tracker vs goal-tracker phenotype may prove to be a valuable animal model to investigate individual differences in the way incentive salience is attributed to environmental stimuli, which may contribute to the development of addiction and other compulsive behavioral disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berridge KC, Robinson TE (2003) Parsing reward. Trends Neurosci 26:507–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boakes R (1977) Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. In: Davis H, HMB H (eds) Operant-pavlovian interactions. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 67–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Breland K, Breland M (1961) The misbehavior of organisms. Am Psychol 16:681–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown B, Hemmes N, Vaca SCd, Pagano C (1993) Sign and goal tracking during delay and trace autoshaping in pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 21:360–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns M, Domjan M (1996) Sign tracking versus goal tracking in the sexual conditioning of male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Processes 22:297–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dalley JW, Laane K, Theobald DE, Armstrong HC, Corlett PR, Chudasama Y, Robbins TW (2005) Time-limited modulation of appetitive Pavlovian memory by D1 and NMDA receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:6189–6194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davey GC, Cleland GG, Oakley DA, Jacobs JL (1984) The effect of early feeding experience on signal-directed response topography in the rat. Physiol Behav 32:11–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falk J, Feingold D (1987) Environmental and cultural factors in the behavioral actions of drugs. In: HY M (ed) Psychopharmacology: the third generation of progress. Raven, New York, pp 1503–1510

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearst E, Jenkins H (1974) Sign-tracking: the stimulus–reinforcer relation and directed action. Monograph of the Psychonomic Society, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz A, Siessmeier T, Wrase J, Hermann D, Klein S, Grusser SM, Flor H, Braus DF, Buchholz HG, Grunder G, Schreckenberger M, Smolka MN, Rosch F, Mann K, Bartenstein P (2004) Correlation between dopamine D(2) receptors in the ventral striatum and central processing of alcohol cues and craving. Am J Psychiatry 161:1783–1789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holland PC (1980) CS–US interval as a determinant of the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responses. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Processes 6:155–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins HM, Moore BR (1973) The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav 20:163–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kabbaj M, Devine DP, Savage VR, Akil H (2000) Neurobiological correlates of individual differences in novelty-seeking behavior in the rat: differential expression of stress-related molecules. J Neurosci 20:6983–6988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemenes G, Benjamin PR (1989) Goal-tracking behavior in the pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. Behav Neural Biol 52:260–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meneses A (2003) A pharmacological analysis of an associative learning task: 5-HT(1) to 5-HT(7) receptor subtypes function on a pavlovian/instrumental autoshaped memory. Learn Mem 10:363–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meneses A, Manuel-Apolinar L, Rocha L, Castillo E, Castillo C (2004) Expression of the 5-HT receptors in rat brain during memory consolidation. Behav Brain Res 152:425–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2003) Guidelines for the care and use of mammals in neuroscience and behavioral research. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Newlin DB (1992) A comparison of drug conditioning and craving for alcohol and cocaine. Recent Dev Alcohol 10:147–164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newlin DB (1999) Evolutionary game theory and multiple chemical sensitivity. Toxicol Ind Health 15:313–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Purdy JE, Roberts AC, Garcia CA (1999) Sign tracking in cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis). J Comp Psychol 113:443–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva FJ, Silva KM, Pear JJ (1992) Sign- versus goal-tracking: effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance. J Exp Anal Behav 57:17–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomie A (1996) Locating reward cue at response manipulandum (CAM) induces symptoms of drug abuse. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 20:505–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomie A, Aguado AS, Pohorecky LA, Benjamin D (2000) Individual differences in pavlovian autoshaping of lever pressing in rats predict stress-induced corticosterone release and mesolimbic levels of monoamines. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 65:509–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner JM, Acerbo MJ, Jones SA, Robinson TE (2006) The attribution of incentive salience to a stimulus that signals an intravenous injection of cocaine. Behav Brain Res 169:320–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (2000) Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Thanos PP, Logan J, Gatley SJ, Gifford A, Ding YS, Wong C, Pappas N (2002) Brain DA D2 receptors predict reinforcing effects of stimulants in humans: replication study. Synapse 46:79–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams D, Williams H (1969) Automaintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 12:511–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the technical assistance of Tracy Simmons, James Stewart, Sharon Burke, and Jennifer Fitzpatrick. We would also like to thank James Beals for assistance with preparing the figures and Brady West (CSCAR, University of Michigan) for providing statistical consultation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelly B. Flagel.

Additional information

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Drug Abuse to H.A. (R01 DA013386) and T.E.R. (R37 DA04294) and from the Office of Naval Research to H.A. and S.J.W. (N00014-02-1-0879).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flagel, S.B., Watson, S.J., Robinson, T.E. et al. Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats. Psychopharmacology 191, 599–607 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0535-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0535-8

Keywords

Navigation