Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Internal models and intermittency: A theoretical account of human tracking behavior

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper concerns the use of tracking studies to test a theoretical account of the information processing performed by the human CNS during control of movement. The theory provides a bridge between studies of reaction time and continuous tracking. It is proposed that the human CNS includes neuronal circuitry to compute inverse internal models of the multiple input, multiple output, dynamic, nonlinear relationships between outgoing motor commands and their resulting perceptual consequences. The inverse internal models are employed during movement execution to transform preplanned trajectories of desired perceptual consequences into appropriate outgoing motor commands to achieve them. A finite interval of time is required by the CNS to preplan the desired perceptual consequences of a movement and it does not commence planning a new movement until planning of the old one has been completed. This behavior introduces intermittency into the planning of movements. In this paper we show that the gain and phase frequency response characteristics of the human operator in a visual pursuit tracking task can be derived theoretically from these assumptions. By incorporating the effects of internal model inaccuracy and of speed-accuracy trade-off in performance, it is shown that various aspects of experimentally measured tracking behavior can be accounted for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beggs WDA, Howarth CI (1972) The accuracy of aiming at a target. Some further evidence for a theory of intermittent control. Acta Psychol 36:171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1976) Time series analysis. Forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik KJW (1947a) Theory of the human operator in control systems. I. The operator as an engineering system. Br J Psychol 38:56–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik KJW (1947b) Theory of the human operator in control systems. II. Man as an element in a control system. Br J Psychol 38:142–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman ERFW, Goodeve PJ (1963) Feedback control of handmovement and Fitts' law. Paper presented to Meeting of the Experimental Society, Cambridge, UK

  • Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM, Peterson JR (1964) Information capacity of discrete motor responses. J Exp Psychol 67:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund H-J (1983) Motor unit and muscle activity in voluntary motor control. Physiol Rev 63:387–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund H-J, Budingen HJ (1978) The relationship between the speed and amplitude of the fastest voluntary contractions of human arm muscles. Exp Brain Res 31:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M (1982) Adaptive filter model of the cerebellum. Biol Cybern 45:195–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopher D, Brickner M, Navon D (1982) Different difficulty manipulations interact differently with task emphasis: evidence for multiple resources. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perf 8:146–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopher D, Sanders AF (1984) S-OH-R, OH stages, OH resources. In: Prinz W, Sanders AF (eds) Cognition and motor processes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene PH (1982) Why is it easy to control your arms? J Mot Beh 14:260–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman LM, Kantowitz BH (1970) The psychological refractory period effect: only half the double stimulation story? Psychol Bull 73:74–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick WE (1948) The discontinuous functioning of the human operator in pursuit tasks. Q J Exp Psychol 1:36–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton G (1984) Parallel computations for controlling an arm. J Mot Beh 16:171–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth CI, Beggs WDA, Bowden JM (1971) The relationship between speed and accuracy of movement aimed at a target. Acta Psychol 35:207–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantowitz BH (1974) Double stimulation. In: Kantowitz BH (ed) Human information processing: tutorials in performance and cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin L, Kestenbaum R (1968) Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Q J Exp Psychol 20:167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele SW (1968) Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychol Bull 70:387–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley CR (1968) Manual and automatic control. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp ST, Wyatt EP (1976) Motor programming within a sequence of responses. J Mot Beh 8:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman DL, Baron S, Levison WH (1970) An optimum control model of human response. Parts 1 and 2. Automatica 6:357–369; 371–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Langolf GD, Chaffin DB, Foulke JA (1976) An investigation of Fitts'law using a wide range of movement amplitudes. J Mot Beh 8:113–128

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland JL (1979) On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychol Rev 86:287–330

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod P (1977) Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychol 41:381–396

    Google Scholar 

  • McRuer DT (1980) Human dynamics in man-machine systems. Automatica 16:237–253

    Google Scholar 

  • McRuer DT, Krendel ES (1959a) The human operator as a servosystem element. J Franklin Inst 267:381–403

    Google Scholar 

  • McRuer DT, Krendel ES (1959b) The human operator as a servosystem element. J Franklin Inst 267:511–536

    Google Scholar 

  • McRuer DT, Krendel ES (1974) Mathematical models of human pilot behavior. AGARDograph 188 North Atlantic Treaty Organization

  • Marr DC, Poggio T (1977) From understanding computation to understanding neural circuitry. Neurosci Res Progr Bull 15:470–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller J (1982) Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perf 8:273–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky M (1986) The society of mind. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon D, Gopher D (1979) On the economy of the human processing system. Psychol Rev 86:214–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson PD (1972) Speed of response or bandwidth of voluntary system controlling elbow position in intact man. Med Biol Eng 10:450–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson PD, Neilson MD, O'Dwyer NJ (1985) Acquisition of motor skills in tracking tasks: learning internal models. In: Russell DG, Abernethy B (eds) Motor memory & control. Human Performance Associates. Dunedin, pp 25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson PD, O'Dwyer NJ, Neilson MD (1987) Central processes underlying the movement disorders of cerebral palsy: a computational model of brain function. J Theor Biol (submitted)

  • Norman DA, Bobrow DJ (1975) On data-limited and resourcelimited processes. Cogn Psychol 7:44–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew RW (1974) Human perceptual-motor performance. In: Kantowitz BH (ed) Information processing: tutorials in performance and cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Raibert MH (1978) A model of sensorimotor control and learning. Biol Cybern 29:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson JA, Tilokskulchai K (1982) Climbing fiber modification of cerebellar Purkinje cells responses to parallel fiber inputs. Brain Res 237:492–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson JA, Tilokskulchai K (1985) Long term modification of cerebellar Purkinje cell discharge by climbing fibre afferents. In: Russell DG, Abernethy B (eds) Motor memory & control. Human Performance Associates, Dunedin, pp 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman E (1979) Levels of sensorimotor representation. J Math Psychol 20:91–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA (1976) The schema as a solution to some persistent problems in motor learning theory. In: Stelmach GE (ed) Motor control issues and trends. Academic Press, New York, pp 41–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark L (1968) Neurological control systems. Studies in bioengineering. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg S, Monsell S, Knoll RL, Wright CE (1978) The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: comparisons of speech and typewriting. In: Stelmach GE (ed) Information processing in motor control and learning. Academic Press, New York, pp 117–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince MA (1948) The intermittency of control movements and the psychological refractory period. Br J Psychol 38:149–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford AT (1952) The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high speed performance — a review and a theory. Br J Psychol 43:2–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford AT (1959) Evidence of a single-channel decision mechanism limiting performance in a serial reaction task. Q J Exp Psychol 11:193–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford AT (1980) The single-channel hypothesis. In: Welford AT (ed) Reaction times. Academic Press, London, pp 215–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD (1980) The structure of processing resources. In: Nickerson R, Pew R (eds) Attention and performance. VIII. Erlbaum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD, Kramer A, Vanasse L, Donchin E (1983) Performance of concurrent tasks: A psychological analysis of reciprocity of information processing resources. Science 221:1080–1082

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spastic Centre Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, 2036, Sydney, Australia

    P. D. Neilson, M. D. Neilson & N. J. O'Dwyer

  2. Department of Neurology, The Prince Henry Hospital, 2036, Sydney, Australia

    P. D. Neilson, M. D. Neilson & N. J. O'Dwyer

Authors
  1. P. D. Neilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. D. Neilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. J. O'Dwyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neilson, P.D., Neilson, M.D. & O'Dwyer, N.J. Internal models and intermittency: A theoretical account of human tracking behavior. Biol. Cybern. 58, 101–112 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364156

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364156

Keywords

Search

Navigation