Rapid CommunicationDrugs of abuse and reward comparison: a brief review☆
References (18)
- et al.
Relative hedonic value modulates anticipatory contrast
Physiology and Behavior
(1994) - et al.
The suppressive effects of LiCl, sucrose, and drugs of abuse are modulated by sucrose concentration in food deprived rats
Physiology and Behavior
(1999) - et al.
Water deprivation prevents morphine-, but not LiCl-induced, suppression of sucrose intake
Physiology and Behavior
(1999) - et al.
Bilateral lesions of the gustatory thalamus disrupt morphine-, but not LiCl-induced intake suppression in rats: evidence against the conditioned taste aversion hypothesis
Brain Research
(2000) - et al.
Conditioned aversion to saccharin by single administrations of mescaline and d-amphetamine
Psychopharmacologia
(1971) - et al.
Anticipation of incentive gain
Animal Learning and Behavior
(1982) - et al.
Deprivation state and temporal horizons in anticipatory contrast
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
(1991) - et al.
Cocaine-induced conditioned taste aversions: comparison between effects in LEW/N and F344/N rat strains
Psychopharmacology
(1994) - et al.
Aversive stimulus properties of drugs: the conditioned taste aversion paradigm
Experimental Approach in Psychopharmacology
(1985)
Cited by (0)
- ☆
This research was supprted by U.S. Public Health Service Grants DA 09815 and DC 02016. We thank the National Institute on Drug Abuse for generously providing morphine sulphate, cocaine hydrochloride, and the morphine and placebo pellets. Additional gratitude is extended to Sarah Ballard and Robert Wheeler for their assistance in data collection and analysis. Based on a presentation to the Columbia University Seminar on Appetite Behaviour, November 11, 1999, sponsored in part by McNeil Speciality Products, Merck Research, and the New York Obesity Research Center, St. Luke's/Roosevelt, Hospital Center. The data shown in Fig. 1 have been adapted from Grigson & Freet, Behavioral Neuroscience, April, 2000 and published with permission. Copyright (2000) by the American Psychological Association.