Table 1.

Participants’ characteristics

R-LDP-LDR-HaloP-HaloR-PlP-Plλ2(5) or F(5,90)p valueEffect size
BMI21.9 ± 0.723.4 ± 0.923.5 ± 1.421.8 ± 1.122.3 ± 0.721.5 ± 0.50.8350.5280.046
Education13 (81.3)11 (68.7)15 (93.8)13 (81.3)15 (93.7)12 (75)16.250.2460.024
MMSE29.7 ± 0.129.4 ± 0.329.4 ± 0.329.7 ± 0.129.5 ± 0.229.7 ± 0.10.600.6990.032
FAB17.6 ± 0.217.6 ± 0.117.1 ± 0.417.6 ± 0.117.6 ± 0.117.7 ± 0.10.890.4950.047
Stroop E0.4 ± 0.20.7 ± 0.30.5 ± 0.21.5 ± 0.50.4 ± 0.21 ± 0.31.870.1090.099
Stroop T4.6 ± 0.94.2 ± 1.33.9 ± 0.95.5 ± 1.75.5 ± 0.75 ± 2.10.270.9280.016
AES-S28.4 ± 1.326 ± 1.527.9 ± 1.531 ± 1.628.7 ± 1.530 ± 1.61.430.2210.074
BDI3.3 ± 0.92.9 ± 13.3 ± 1.16 ± 1.73.7 ± 1.15.2 ± 1.31.010.4220.053
SP3.7 ± 0.73.4 ± 0.54.8 ± 0.64.1 ± 0.63.8 ± 0.73.7 ± 0.70.560.7320.030
SR4.8 ± 0.63.7 ± 0.55.2 ± 0.65.3 ± 0.54.4 ± 0.63.8 ± 0.71.440.2180.074
Money18.3 ± 0.418.1 ± 0.617.7 ± 0.618 ± 0.218 ± 0.418.9 ± 0.30.710.6190.038
Success rate435 (12.6)454 (13.1)419 (12.1)407 (11.8)454 (13.1)463 (13.4)6.440.2660.129
  • Categorical values are indicated as number and percentages (%), numeric values as mean ± SEM. Comparison between proportions is made with χ2 test, comparison between means with one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis (MMSE, FAB, Stroop, BDI) test. Effect size is provided as phi for χ2 test, partial η for ANOVA, and ε2 for Kruskal–Wallis. R-LD, n = 16; P-LD, n = 16; R-Halo, n = 16; P-Halo, n = 16; R-Pl, n = 16; P-Pl, n = 16; Education, participants with ≥15 years of education; BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); MMSE, mini-mental state examination; FAB, frontal assessment battery; AES-S, apathy evaluation scale, self-administered version; BDI, Beck depression inventory; SP, sensitivity to punishment; SR, sensitivity to reward; Money, GBP (£) received at the end of the session; Success rate, number of trials in which the maximum amount of points was received (i.e., four points in the reward groups and zero points in the punishment groups).