Table 4.

Statistical summary for Figures 3, 4

VariableComparisonData structureStatistical testOutputp valuePost hoc powerEffect size
Sociability investigation timevCelf6-Extended, drug (FLX vs vehicle)NormalTwo-way rmANOVAF(1,111) = 5.608p = 0.0200.6510.225
xCelf6 ++ FLX social vs empty stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,111) = 6.983p = 0.0090.7450.250
xCelf6 +/- FLX social vs empty stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,111) = 5.440p = 0.0210.6380.222
xCelf6 -/- FLX social vs empty stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,111) = 7.821p = 0.0060.7920.266
xCelf6++ vehicle social vs empty stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,111) = 5.998p = 0.0160.6800.232
xCelf6 +/- vehicle social vs empty stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,111) = 8.852p = 0.0040.8390.283
xCelf6-/- vehicle social vs empty stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,111) = 15.898p = 0.00010.9770.378
wSocial stimulus FLX vs vehicleNormalSimple main effectF(1,222) = 4.895p = 0.0280.5960.150
yLong Prenatal, stimulus × drug interactionNormalOne-way rmANOVAF(1,40) = 14.627p = 0.00040.9620.605
zFLX social vs empty stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,40) = 0.216p = 0.6450.0740.071
aaVehicle social vs empty stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,40) = 28.149p < 0.0000050.9990.839
bbSocial stimulus FLX vs vehicleNormalSimple main effectF(1,80) = 16.659p = 0.00010.9810.456
ccShort Prenatal, stimulus × drug interactionNormalOne-way rmANOVAF(1,42) = 0.002p = 0.9620.0500.007
ddFLX social vs empty stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,42) = 12.337p = 0.0010.9290.032
eeVehicle social vs empty stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,42) = 11.715p = 0.0010.9170.032
ffSocial stimulus FLX vs vehicleNormalSimple main effectF(1,84) = 0.124p = 0.7260.0640.032
Social novelty investigation timeggCelf6-Extended, drug (FLX vs vehicle)NormalTwo-way rmANOVAF(1,111) = 3.468p = 0.0650.4550.176
hhCelf6 ++ FLX Fam vs novel stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,111) = 8.845p = 0.0040.8380.283
hhCelf6 +/- FLX Fam vs novel stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,111) = 7.618p = 0.0070.7810.261
hhCelf6 -/- FLX Fam vs novel stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,111) = 11.659p = 0.00090.9230.324
hhCelf6 ++ vehicle Fam vs novel stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,111) = 5.812p = 0.0180.6660.229
hhCelf6 +/- vehicle Fam vs novel stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,111) = 9.616p = 0.0020.8670.295
hhCelf6 -/- vehicle Fam vs novel stimulusNormalSimple main effectF(1,111) = 18.954p = 0.000030.9910.413
hhLong Prenatal, stimulus (Fam vs novel cup)Non-normalOne-way rmANOVAF(1,40) = 46.742p < 0.00000511.081
hhFLX Fam vs novel stimulusNon-normalSimple main effectF(1,40) = 11.365p = 0.0020.9080.533
hhVehicle Fam vs novel stimulusNon-normalSimple main effectF(1,40) = 42.911p < 0.00000511.037
hhShort Prenatal, stimulus (Fam vs novel cup)Non-normalOne-way rmANOVAF(1,40) = 13.815p = 0.0010.9520.588
hhFLX Fam vs novel stimulusNon-normalSimple main effectF(1,40) = 10.119p = 0.0030.8740.503
hhVehicle Fam vs novel stimulusnormalSimple main effectF(1,40) = 4.307p = 0.0440.5260.328
Percent tube test bouts woniiC57-Extended FLX, compared to 50%Non-normalOne-spl WilcoxonZ = 2.418p = 0.016N/A0.24
jjC57-Extended vehicle, compared to 50%Non-normalOne-spl WilcoxonZ = -2.398p = 0.016N/A0.24
kkLong Prenatal FLX, compared to 50%Non-normalOne-spl WilcoxonZ = -2.356p = 0.018N/A0.69
kkLong Prenatal vehicle, compared to 50%Non-normalOne-spl WilcoxonZ = 1.873p = 0.061N/A0.44
llShort Prenatal FLX, compared to 50%Non-normalOne-spl WilcoxonZ = -1.907p = 0.057N/A0.20
llShort Prenatal vehicle, compared to 50%Non-normalOne-spl WilcoxonZ = 1.691p = 0.091N/A0.16
Adult weightmmC57-Extended, drug (FLX vs vehicle)NormalTwo-way ANOVAF(1,12) = 0.475p = 0.5040.0970.199
nnLong Prenatal, drug (FLX vs vehicle)NormalTwo-way ANOVAF(1,40) = 8.096p = 0.0070.7930.449
ooShort Prenatal, drug (FLX vs vehicle)NormalTwo-way ANOVAF(1,40) = 1.796p = 0.1880.2580.212
  • Effect sample size for F tests reported as Cohen’s f (Cohen, 1988; interpretation: 0.01 = small; 0.25 = medium; 0.40 = large) and for nonparametric tests reported as η2.