Results of the model comparison of the 2 × 2 dynamic causal models in which visual reliability (VR) modulated the connection from V1-3 to IPS0–4 and modality-specific report (MR) modulated the connection from PFC to IPS0–4
| Factor | Modulation VR and MR | Modulation VR | Modulation MR | No modulation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model evidence (FFX) | 0 | –52.947 | –54.033 | –90.45 |
| Posterior p (FFX) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Expected posterior p (RFX) | 0.587 | 0.136 | 0.139 | 0.139 |
| Exceedance p (RFX) | 0.902 | 0.032 | 0.033 | 0.033 |
| Protected exceedance p (RFX) | 0.699 | 0.1 | 0.101 | 0.101 |
FFX, fixed-effects analysis; RFX, random-effects analysis; model evidence corresponds to free energy (relative to full model) summed over participants (i.e., larger is better); expected posterior p, probability that a given model generated the data for a randomly selected subject; exceedance p, probability that a given model is more likely than any other model; protected exceedance p, probability that one model is more likely than any other model beyond chance.