Table 1.

Summary of statistical analysis.

LineData analyzedResultsData structureType of testObserved power or confidence interval
aTotal play: female vehicle, female ACEA, female GP1aF(2, 224) = 0.28, p = 0.756NormalANOVA0.094
bPouncing: female vehicle, female ACEA, female GP1aF(2, 222) = 0.2.713, p = 0.069NormalANOVA0.533
cPinning: female vehicle, female ACEA, female GP1aF(2, 210) = 0.699, p = 0.498NormalANOVA0.167
dNumber of gridlines crossed: female vehicle, female ACEA, female GP1aF(2, 23) = 1.008, p = 0.383NormalANOVA0.201
eTime spent in the center zone: female vehicle, female ACEA, female GP1aF(2, 23) = 0.262, p = 0.772NormalANOVA0.086
fTotal play: male vehicle, male AM281, male AM630F(2, 208) = 1.314, p = 0.271NormalANOVA0.282
gPouncing: male vehicle, male AM281, male AM630F(2, 208) = 2.103, p = 0.125NormalANOVA0.429
hPinning: male vehicle, male AM281, male AM630F(2, 187) = 5.483, p = 0.005NormalANOVA0.845
iPinning: male vehicle, male AM281p = 0.675Tukey post hoc–0.4573 to 0.2162
jPinning: male vehicle, male AM630p = 0.004Tukey post hoc–0.7868 to –0.1227
kNumber of gridlines crossed: male vehicle, male AM281, male AM630F(2, 21) = 1.150, p = 0.339NormalANOVA0.221
lTime spent in the center zone: male vehicle, male AM281, male AM630F(2, 21) = 1.568, p = 0.236NormalANOVA0.289
mTotal play: male vehicle, female vehicle, male WIN, female WIN, male ACEA+GP1a, female ACEA+GP1aF(2, 360) = 4.449, p = 0.012Normal2-Way ANOVA: sex × treatment interaction0.762
nF(1, 360) = 4.108, p = 0.043Main effect of sex0.524
0F(1, 360) = 2.275, p = 0.104Main effect of treatment0.461
pTotal play: male vehicle, female vehiclet(109.2) = 2.666, p = 0.0089t-test0.5331 to 3.624
qTotal play: female vehicle, female WINt(127.3) = 2.01, p = 0.0465t-test0.023 to 2.919
rTotal play: female vehicle, female ACEA+GP1at(114.7) = 2.071, p = 0.0406t-test0.07583 to 3.415
sTotal play: male vehicle, female WINt(112.5) = 0.7378, p = 0.4622t-test–1.024 to 2.24
tTotal play: male vehicle, female ACEA+GP1at(116.8) = 0.3607, p = 0.719t-test–1.497 to 2.163
uTotal play: male vehicle, male WINt(83.32) = 0.882, p = 0.3803t-test–1.182 to 3.066
vTotal play: male vehicle, male ACEA+GP1at(109) = 1.711, p = 0.0899t-test–3.2 to 0.2348
wPouncing: male vehicle, female vehicle, male WIN, female WIN, male ACEA+GP1a, female ACEA+GP1aF(2, 359) = 6.914, p = 0.001Normal2-Way ANOVA: sex × treatment interaction0.923
×F(1, 359) = 3.474, p = 0.63Main effect of sex0.46
yF(2, 359) = 3.7, p = 0.026Main effect of treatment0.677
zPouncing: male vehicle, female vehiclet(118.7) = 2.347, p = 0.0206t-test0.2161 to 2.551
aaPouncing: female vehicle, female WINt(131) = 1.358, p = 0.1767t-test–0.3653 to 1.966
bbPouncing: female vehicle, female ACEA+GP1at(119.8) = 2.123, p = 0.0358t-test0.09501 to 2.724
ccPouncing: male vehicle, female WINt(116.3) = 0.947, p = 0.3456t-test–0.6366 to 1.803
ddPouncing: male vehicle, female ACEA+GP1at(115.3) = 0.038, p = 0.9698t-test–1.388 to 1.336
eePouncing: male vehicle, male WINt(77.85) = 1.917, p = 0.0589t-test–0.06252 to 3.323
ffPouncing: male vehicle, male ACEA+GP1at(108.9) = 2.069, p = 0.0409t-test–2.554 to –0.05488
ggPinning: male vehicle, female vehicle, male WIN, female WIN, male ACEA+GP1a, female ACEA+GP1aF(2, 329) = 3.171, p = 0.043Normal2-Way ANOVA: sex × treatment interaction0.605
hhF(1, 329) = 4.158, p = 0.042Main effect of sex0.529
iiF(2, 329) = 3.53, p = 0.03Main effect of treatment0.655
jjPinning: male vehicle, female vehiclet(70.79) = 3.206, p = 0.002t-test0.2814 to 1.207
kkPinning: female vehicle, female WINt(99.25) = 5.11, p < 0.0001t-test0.5536 to 1.256
llPinning: female vehicle, female ACEA+GP1at(89.6) = 2.911, p = 0.0045t-test0.1803 to 0.9554
mmPinning: male vehicle, female WINt(96.71) = 0.6144, p = 0.5404t-test–0.6797 to 0.3584
nnPinning: male vehicle, female ACEA+GP1at(103.2) = 0.6438, p = 0.5211t-test–0.367 to 0.7198
ooPinning: male vehicle, male WINt(94.97) = 0.002952, p = 0.9977t-test–0.576 to 0.5777
ppPinning: male vehicle, male ACEA+GP1at(105) = 0.4127, p = 0.6807t-test–0.4773 to 0.7281
qqNumber of gridlines crossed: male vehicle, female vehicle, male WIN, female WIN, male ACEA+GP1a, female ACEA+GP1aF(2, 45) = 2.497, p = 0.095Normal2-Way ANOVA: sex × treatment interaction0.471
rrF(2, 45) = 0.39, p = 0.536Main effect of sex0.094
ssF(1, 45) = 1.145, p = 0.329Main effect of treatment0.237
ttTime spent in the center zone: male vehicle, female vehicle, male WIN, female WIN, male ACEA+GP1a, female ACEA+GP1aF(2, 45) = 0.701, p = 0.502Normal2-Way ANOVA: sex × treatment interaction0.16
uuF(1, 45) = 1.592, p = 0.215Main effect of sex0.234
vvF(2, 45) = 0.936, p = 0.401Main effect of treatment0.2
wwTotal play: male vehicle, female vehicle, male AM281+AM630, female AM281+AM630F(1,240) = 7.081, p = 0.008Normal2-Way ANOVA: sex × treatment interaction0.755
xxF(1, 240) = 11.592, p = 0.001Main effect of sex0.924
yyF(1, 240) = 5.207, p = 0.023Main effect of treatment0.623
zzTotal play: male vehicle, female vehiclet(126) = 4.011, p = 0.0001t-test–9.707 to –3.293
aaaTotal play: male vehicle, male AM281+AM630t(105.5) = 3.195, p = 0.0018t-test–8.584 to –2.01
bbbTotal play: female vehicle, male AM281+AM630t(106.1) = 0.7202, p = 0.473t-test–4.515 to 2.109
cccTotal play: female vehicle, female AM281+AM630t(106.2) = 0.2976, p = 7.666t-test–2.3 to 3.113
dddPouncing: male vehicle, female vehicle, male AM281+AM630, female AM281+AM630F(1, 240) = 0.7072, p = 0.008Normal2-Way ANOVA: sex × treatment interaction0.754
eeeF(1, 240) = 13.742, p < 0.0001Main effect of sex0.958
fffF(1, 240) = 6.151, p = 0.014Main effect of treatment0.695
gggPouncing: male vehicle, female vehiclet(124,9) = 4.191, p < 0.0001t-test–7.361 to –2.639
hhhPouncing: male vehicle, male AM281+AM630t(107.5) = 3.225, p = 0.0017t-test–4.036 to 1.252
iiiPouncing: female vehicle, male AM281+AM630t(103,6) = 0.8051, p = 0.4226t-test–3.337 to 1.41
jjjPouncing: female vehicle, female AM281+AM630t(107.8) = 0.1472, p = 0.8833t-test–1.754 to 2.035
kkkPinning: male vehicle, female vehicle, male AM281+AM630, female AM281+AM630F(1, 235) = 10.073, p = 0.002Normal2-Way ANOVA: sex × treatment interaction0.885
lllF(1, 235) = 1.538, p = 0.216Main effect of sex0.235
mmmF(1, 235) = 2.716, p = 0.101Main effect of treatment0.375
nnnPinning: male vehicle, female vehiclet(122.1) = 3.015, p = 0.0031t-test–2.532 to –0.5248
oooPinning: male vehicle, male AM281+AM630t(106.5) = 3.251, p = 0.0015t-test–2.687 to –0.6514
pppPinning: female vehicle, male AM281+AM630t(101.2) = 0.2961, p = 0.7678t-test–0.8049 to 1.087
qqqPinning: female vehicle, female AM281+AM630t(121.8) = 1.189, p = 0.2368t-test–0.3514 to 1.408
rrrNumber of gridlines crossed: male vehicle, female vehicle, male AM281+AM630, female AM281+AM630F(1, 32) = 0.119, p = 0.733Normal2-Way ANOVA: sex × treatment interaction0.063
sssF(1, 32) = 0.001, p = 0.872Main effect of sex0.05
tttF(1, 32) = 0.071, p = 0.792Main effect of treatment0.058
uuuTime spent in the center zone: male vehicle, female vehicle, male AM281+AM630, female AM281+AM630F(1, 32) = 0.377, p - 0.544Normal2-Way ANOVA: sex × treatment interaction0.091
vvvF(1, 32) = 0.008, p = 0.93Main effect of sex0.051
wwwF(1, 32) = 0.406, p = 0.529Main effect of treatment0.094
xxxPN4 cell body area, left hemisphere: male, femalet(56.06) = 0.0325, p = 0.0325Normalt-test–311.4 to –14.03
yyyPN4 cell body area, right hemisphere: male, femalet(48.57) = 2.088, p = 0.042Normalt-test–353 to –6.739
zzzPN4 number of dendrites, left hemisphere: male, femalet(73.5) = 0.9388, p = 0.3509Normalt-test–1.024 to 0.368
aaaaPN4 number of dendrites, right hemisphere: male, femalet(68.86) = 1.385, p = 0.1705Normalt-test–0.2165 to 1.2
bbbbPN4 number of nodes, left hemisphere: male, femalet(73.09) = 0.9446, p = 0.348Normalt-test–1.935 to 0.6905
ccccPN4 number of nodes, right hemisphere: male, femalet(71.89) = 0.643, p = 0.5223Normalt-test–0.5776 to 1.128
ddddPN4 spine density, left hemisphere: male, femalet(72.17) = 0.2635, p = 0.7929Normalt-test–0.01184 to 0.01545
eeeePN4 spine density, right hemisphere: male, femalet(72.52) = 0.06693, p = 0.9468Normalt-test–0.01593 to 0.01489
ffffPN4 total dendrite length, left hemisphere: male, femalet(74) = 1.527, p = 0.1309Normalt-test–64.47 to 8.518
ggggPN4 total dendrite length, right hemisphere: male, femalet(72.09) = 0.2125, p = 0.8323Normalt-test–28.12 to 34.83
hhhhPN4 average dendrite length, left hemisphere: male, femalet(71.66) = 1.452, p = 0.1509Normalt-test–14.13 to 2.221
iiiiPN4 average dendrite length, right hemisphere: male, femalet(71.1) = 0.82898, p = 0.4094Normalt-test–11.26 to 4.641
PN26 factor analysis: sex differences in neuronal morphology
jjjjFactor 1, left hemisphere: male, femalet(40.31) = 0.4664, p = 0.6435Normalt-test–0.4694 to 0.7511
kkkkFactor 1, right hemisphere: male, femalet(28.31) = 3.454, p = 0.0018Normalt-test–1.479 to –0.378
llllFactor 2, left hemisphere: male, femalet(43.65) = 0.2945, p = 0.7698Normalt-test–0.6725 to 0.5011
mmmmFactor 2, right hemisphere: male, femalet(30.22) = 0.7176, p = 0.4785Normalt-test–0.4041 to 0.842
nnnnFactor 3, left hemisphere: male, femalet(42.96) = 0.9127, p = 0.3665Normalt-test–0.3008 to 0.798
ooooFactor 3, right hemisphere: male, femalet(46) = 1.431, p = 0.1592Normalt-test–0.9151 to 0.1546
PN26 factor analysis: effects of specific and dual agonism on neuronal morphology
ppppFactor 1, left hemisphere: female vehicle, female ACEA, female GP1aF(2, 60) = 0.533, p = 0.0589NormalANOVA0.134
qqqqFactor 1, left hemisphere, female vehicle: female ACEA+GP1at(38.27) = 0.4245, p = 0.6735Normalt-test–0.4879 to 0.747
rrrrFactor 1, right hemisphere: female vehicle, female ACEA, female GP1aF(2, 60) = 2.099, p = 0.132NormalANOVA0.414
ssssFactor 1, right hemisphere: female vehicle, female ACEA+GP1at(37.95) = 1.639, p = 0.1094Normalt-test–1.193 to 0.1255
ttttFactor 2, left hemisphere: female vehicle, female ACEA, female GP1aF(2, 60) = 2.576, p = 0.085NormalANOVA0.494
left hemisphere: female vehicle, female ACEA, female GP1a
uuuuFactor 2, left hemisphere: female vehicle, female ACEA+GP1at(36.6) = 0.2349, p = 0.8156Normalt-test–0.5315 to 0.6708
vvvvFactor 2, right hemisphere: female vehicle, female ACEA, female GP1aF(2, 60) = 0.235, p = 0.791NormalANOVA0.085
wwwwFactor 2, right hemisphere: female vehicle, female ACEA+GP1at(39.38) = 1.888, p = 0.0664Normalt-test–0.03766 to 1.099
PN26 dual agonism masculinizes neuronal morphology
xxxxFactor 1, left hemisphere: male vehicle, female vehicle, female ACEA+GP1aF(2, 72) = 0.257, p = 0.774NormalANOVA0.089
yyyyFactor 1, right hemisphere: male vehicle, female vehicle, female ACEA+GP1aF(2, 72) = 5.689, p = 0.005NormalANOVA0.849
zzzzFactor 1, right hemisphere: male vehicle, female vehiclep = 0.008Tukey's Post-hoc–1.3958 to –0.1738
aaaaaFactor 1, right hemisphere: female vehicle, female ACEA+GP1ap = 0.012Tukey’s post hoc0.1473 to 1.4254
bbbbbFactor 1, right hemisphere: male vehicle, female ACEA+GP1ap = 1.000Tukey’s post hoc–0.5597 to 0.5628
cccccFactor 2, left hemisphere: male vehicle, female vehicle, female ACEA+GP1aF(2, 72) = 0.956, p = 0.775NormalANOVA0.089
dddddFactor 2, right hemisphere: male vehicle, female vehicle, female ACEA+GP1aF(2, 72) = 1.991, p = 0.144NormalANOVA0.398