Table 4:

Statistical results for Morris water maze (MWM) acquisition performance in Fmr1 and WT mice

EffectData structureType of testPowerdf (between)df (within)FP
MWM acquisition latency-genotypeSphericity violatedMixed-model ANOVA0.191221.310.3
MWM acquisition latency-daySphericity violatedMixed-model ANOVA with Greenhouse–Geisser correction1.004.63101.9525.735.55E-16
MWM acquisition latency-interactionSphericity violatedMixed-model ANOVA with Greenhouse–Geisser correction0.264.63101.950.610.7
MWM acquisition distance-genotypeSphericity passedMixed-model ANOVA0.121220.620.4
MWM acquisition distance-daySphericity passedMixed-model ANOVA1.00715416.266.66E-16
MWM acquisition distance-interactionSphericity passedMixed-model ANOVA0.3671540.850.5
MWM acquisition speed-genotypeSphericity violatedMixed-model ANOVA0.321222.470.1
MWM acquisition speed-daySphericity violatedMixed-model ANOVA with Greenhouse–Geisser correction1.004.4998.829.640.0000005
MWM acquisition speed-interactionSphericity violatedMixed-model ANOVA with Greenhouse–Geisser correction0.294.4998.820.690.6
WT quadrant timeSphericity passedRepeated-measures ANOVA with post hoc Dunnett’s test0.973337.190.0008
FMR1 quadrant timeSphericity violatedRepeated-measures ANOVA with Greenhouse–Geisser correction and post hoc Dunnett’s test1.001.6518.1625.040.00001
WT platform crossingsSphericity passedRepeated-measures ANOVA with post hoc Dunnett’s test0.9933312.540.00001
FMR1 platform crossingsSphericity violatedRepeated-measures ANOVA with Greenhouse–Geisser correction and post hoc Dunnett’s test1.001.3614.9828.160.00003