Results from the LMM analyses investigating repetition congruency (repetition vs non-repetition) and repetition probability in log transformed response times from the repetition priming task (experiment 2)
| FE | SE | t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full model | |||
| Repetition congruency | –0.13 | 0.0035 | 39.55 |
| Probability | –0.060 | 0.0029 | 20.43 |
| Repetition congruency × probability | –0.033 | 0.0033 | 9.99 |
| OLD20 | –0.0036 | 0.0047 | 0.76 |
| Number of syllables | 0.0010 | 0.0047 | 0.22 |
| Post hoc: repetition trials | |||
| Probability | –0.085 | 0.0044 | 19.28 |
| Post hoc: non-repetition trials | |||
| –0.022 | 0.0037 | 6.06 | |
| Post hoc: (repetition–non-repetition) | |||
| Probability: 25% vs 50% | –0.040 | 0.0055 | 7.36 |
| Probability: 50% vs 75% | –0.043 | 0.010 | 4.26 |
Significant effects (i.e., t > 2) are shown in bold numerals. FE = fixed effect estimates.