Table 3.

Statistics for Figure 3

GraphData structureType of testp
Fig. 3B, bin 1NonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs 0.25 µg, p = 0.0013;
Cont vs 0.13 µg, p = 0.0013;
Cont vs 0.06 µg, p = 0.0028;
Cont vs 0.03 µg, p = 0.8787
Fig. 3B, bin 2NonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs 0.25 µg, p = 0.0693;
Cont vs 0.13 µg, p = 0.0453;
Cont vs 0.06 µg, p = 0.9317;
Cont vs 0.03 µg, p = 0.9990
Fig. 3B, bin 3NonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs 0.25 µg, p = 0.1044;
Cont vs 0.13 µg, p = 0.2141;
Cont vs 0.06 µg, p = 0.8898;
Cont vs 0.03 µg, p = 0.8352
Fig. 3B, bin 4NonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs 0.25 µg, p = 0.0098;
Cont vs 0.13 µg, p = 0.0196;
Cont vs 0.06 µg, p = 0.3581;
Cont vs 0.03 µg, p = 0.9985
Fig. 3B, bin 5NonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs 0.25 µg, p = 0.8286;
Cont vs 0.13 µg, p = 0.7255;
Cont vs 0.06 µg, p = 0.8286;
Cont vs 0.03 µg, p = 1.0000
Fig. 3B, bin 6NonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs 0.25 µg, p = 0.4412;
Cont vs 0.13 µg, p = 0.4412;
Cont vs 0.06 µg, p = 0.9667;
Cont vs 0.03 µg, p = 0.9999
Fig. 3CNonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs 0.25 µg, p = 0.6147;
Cont vs 0.13 µg, p = 0.9493;
Cont vs 0.06 µg, p = 0.7574;
Cont vs 0.03 µg, p = 0.9162
Fig. 3DNonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs 0.25 µg, p = 0.0015;
Cont vs 0.13 µg, p = 0.0015;
Cont vs 0.06 µg, p = 0.0015;
Cont vs 0.03 µg, p = 0.1825