Table 5

Statistics for Figure 5

GraphData structureType of testp
Fig. 5D, bin 1NonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.8335;
Cont vs pDNA, p = 5.6 × 10−6;
pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 2.4 × 10−4;
Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 2.1 × 10−5
Fig. 5D, bin 2NonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.6401;
Cont vs pDNA, p = 1.3 × 10−5;
pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.0627;
Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.0163
Fig. 5D, bin 3NonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.9781;
Cont vs pDNA, p = 8.2 × 10−5;
pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 4.7 × 10−4;
Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.5691
Fig. 5D, bin 4NonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.9746;
Cont vs pDNA, p = 0.0102;
pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.1967;
Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.3568
Fig. 5D, bin 5NonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.9276;
Cont vs pDNA, p = 0.0610;
pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.7661;
Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.5053
Fig. 5D, bin 6NonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.9955;
Cont vs pDNA, p = 0.9158;
pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.7539;
Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.9840
Fig. 5ENonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.8121;
Cont vs pDNA, p = 8.4 × 10−6;
pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.0374;
Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 8.4 × 10−6
Fig. 5FNonparametricSteel–DwassCont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.9966;
Cont vs pDNA, p = 0.9982;
pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.6688;
Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.7716