Table 1

. Whole-cell recording properties for Figures 13

Mean ± SEM of GnRH whole-cell passive properties from Figure 1
Diestrous PMProestrus AMProestrus PM
Rin (MΩ)929 ± 421336 ± 160*1034 ± 63
Capacitance (pF)14.7 ± 0.713.0 ± 0.814.5 ± 0.7
Rs (MΩ)13.2 ± 0.613.5 ± 1.014.6 ± 0.7
Ihold (pA)-13.6 ± 4.2-0.15 ± 4.7#-17.4 ± 2.8
*p < 0.05 vs diestrous PM; #p < 0.01 vs proestrous PM, Tukey’s
ANOVA parameters for comparison of GnRH passive properties (Fig. 1)
Rin (MΩ)F(2,33) = 4.84
Capacitance (pF)F(2,33) = 1.32
Rs (MΩ)F(2,33) = 0.951
Ihold (pA)F(2,33) = 5.38
Mean ± SEM of GnRH whole-cell passive properties from Figure 2
Diestrous PMProestrus PM
Rin (MΩ)
Before TTX
During TTX

1053 ± 88
846 ± 83

1113 ± 145
775 ± 91
Capacitance (pF)
Before TTX
During TTX

15.8 ± 0.8
15.0 ± 0.8

13.2 ± 0.9
13.8 ± 1.0
Rs (MΩ)
Before TTX
During TTX

12.1 ± 0.9
13.3 ± 1.5

12.3 ± 0.6
14.7 ± 0.8
Ihold (pA)
Before TTX
During TTX

-16.4 ± 3.5
-25.1 ± 6.3

-19.4 ± 2.6
-28.5 ± 3.8
Two-way repeated measures ANOVA for comparison of GnRH passive properties among groups (Fig. 2)
GroupTTXGroup × TTX
Rin (MΩ)F(1,9) = 0.001F(1,9) = 36.0***F(1,9) = 2.1
Capacitance (pF)F(1,9) = 2.5F(1,9) = 0.1F(1,9) = 6.9*
Rs (MΩ)F(1,9) = 0.4F(1,9) = 6.0*F(1,9) = 0.7
Ihold (pA)F(1,9) = 0.3F(1,9) = 14.1**F(1,9) = 0.01
Mean ± SEM of GnRH whole-cell passive properties from Figure 3
Diestrous PMProestrous AMProestrous PM
Rin (MΩ)1125 ± 150667 ± 43*1361 ± 144
Capacitance (pF)13.7 ± 0.713.8 ± 0.712.5 ± 0.8
Rs (MΩ)13.5 ± 0.911.9 ± 0.913.5 ± 1.4
Ihold (pA)-0.7 ± 5.2-2.8 ± 6.3-10.1 ± 4.4
*p < 0.05 vs diestrous PM, Tukey’s
ANOVA parameters for comparison of GnRH passive properties (Fig. 3)
Rin (MΩ)F(2,22) = 6.65
Capacitance (pF)F(2,22) = 1.02
Rs (MΩ)F(2,22) = 0.62
Ihold (pA)KW = 3.36