TY - JOUR T1 - Editorial: <em>eNeuro</em> Offers a Unique Interactive Experience to Reviewer Training JF - eneuro JO - eNeuro DO - 10.1523/ENEURO.0157-17.2017 VL - 4 IS - 3 SP - ENEURO.0157-17.2017 AU - Christophe Bernard Y1 - 2017/05/01 UR - http://www.eneuro.org/content/4/3/ENEURO.0157-17.2017.abstract N2 - Dear friends and colleagues,As you know, scientific research stands on three pillars: the observations and conclusions we generate in the lab, their validation by peer reviewing, and their publication. If one pillar starts to wobble, the science suffers. The quality of the data we produce is our sole responsibility. Everyone agrees that publishing one’s results can be a painful process, leading to the dissatisfaction of many authors. SfN journals along with other nonprofit journals are trying to improve the publication process to improve the experience for scientists. However, the problems of peer review remain poorly addressed. Everybody complains about the review process, myself included. We often feel mistreated by reviewers or editors, even if the latter are … ER -