@article {SmithENEURO.0105-16.2016, author = {Wesley C. Smith and Matthew H. Rosenberg and Leslie D. Claar and Victoria Chang and Sagar N. Shah and Wendy M. Walwyn and Christopher J. Evans and Sotiris C. Masmanidis}, title = {Frontostriatal Circuit Dynamics Correlate with Cocaine Cue-Evoked Behavioral Arousal during Early Abstinence}, volume = {3}, number = {3}, elocation-id = {ENEURO.0105-16.2016}, year = {2016}, doi = {10.1523/ENEURO.0105-16.2016}, publisher = {Society for Neuroscience}, abstract = {It is thought that frontostriatal circuits play an important role in mediating conditioned behavioral responses to environmental stimuli that were previously encountered during drug administration. However, the neural correlates of conditioned responses to drug-associated cues are not well understood at the level of large populations of simultaneously recorded neurons, or at the level of local field potential (LFP) synchrony in the frontostriatal network. Here we introduce a behavioral assay of conditioned arousal to cocaine cues involving pupillometry in awake head-restrained mice. After just 24 h of drug abstinence, brief exposures to olfactory stimuli previously paired with cocaine injections led to a transient dilation of the pupil, which was greater than the dilation effect to neutral cues. In contrast, there was no cue-selective change in locomotion, as measured by the rotation of a circular treadmill. The behavioral assay was combined with simultaneous recordings from dozens of electrophysiologically identified units in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and ventral striatum (VS). We found significant relationships between cocaine cue-evoked pupil dilation and the proportion of inhibited principal cells in the mPFC and VS. Additionally, LFP coherence analysis revealed a significant correlation between pupillary response and synchrony in the 25{\textendash}45 Hz frequency band. Together, these results show that pupil dilation is sensitive to drug-associated cues during acute stages of abstinence, and that individual animal differences in this behavioral arousal response can be explained by two complementary measures of frontostriatal network activity.}, URL = {https://www.eneuro.org/content/3/3/ENEURO.0105-16.2016}, eprint = {https://www.eneuro.org/content/3/3/ENEURO.0105-16.2016.full.pdf}, journal = {eNeuro} }