Figure 2C
Across frequencies | Two-way RM ANOVA | Location: F(1,24) = 3.261; p = 0.0835Frequency: F(29,696) = 2.400; p < 0.0001Location × frequency: F(29,696) = 0.6265; p = 0.9383 | |
Figure 2D, δ | Paired t test | t(12) = 2.580, p = 0.02 | |
Figure 2E, θ | Paired t test | t(12) = 1.934, p = 0.08 | |
Figure 2F, β | Paired t test | t(12) = 1.639, p = 0.13 | |
Figure 3C, δ | Unpaired t test | t(11) = 2.353, p = 0.04 | |
Figure 3D, θ | Unpaired t test | t(11) = 1.264, p = 0.23 | |
Figure 3E, % time in nest | Unpaired t test | t(11) = 0.09022, p = 0.9297 | |
Figure 3F, % time nipple-attached | Unpaired t test | t(10) = 0.4373, p = 0.6712 | |
Figure 4C, δ | One-way ANOVA | F(3,12) = 4.704, p = 0.0215 | SAL-FLX vs SAL-SAL: p = 0.012SAL-FLX vs KET-FLX: p = 0.008SAL-FLX vs KET-SAL: p = 0.010SAL-SAL vs KET-FLX: p = 0.829SAL-SAL vs KET-SAL: p = 0.920KET-FLX vs KET-SAL: p = 0.908 |
Figure 4E, USVs | One-way ANOVA | F(3,20) = 2.039, p = 0.1407 | |